|
It's always interesting how even these type of polls are between TMM and Mansion. And from the press photos, management in both companies are handsome.
We use NATS and Carma together and really like the software. There is a learning curve in getting the program set up and implementing all of the features, but once you have a good grasp on the process it's smooth. And overall, doing business with TMM is great and support is fast. I hear many great things about Mansion, including great software and support. No practical experience in using them though. One of the main reasons is in just about every thread for Mansion some drops the past shaving comments. Does that hurt overall business and keep affiliates from not wanting to sell the product? I can't be sure... but I wouldn't like having one more thing to worry about.
Some of the bigger programs use custom solutions since NATS / MPA3 did not exist when the programs were created. It would be a HUGE undertaking to change over all of the software for possibly little to no benefit.
... and if it ain't broke, why fix it?
Any program looking to change over does so on idea it will increase business, through more efficient management and increased sales/reputation and the cleanliness of a integrated solution. A few programs have such muddled custom Frankenstein backends that have been modified by multiple programmers that even they don't know what end is up.
Talk about specific details on what you need the software to accomplish with your program.... that would help in advice on a decision. These threads end up being popularity contests.
And most importantly you should contact your affiliates directly to see their opinions on changing to a new affiliate management platform.
Are you planning on keeping the CCbill program running as well?
|