Quote:
Originally posted by GotGauge
My answer above is by todays standards, of DNA testing,
and other modern technology.
I was somewhat against it before DNA testing, but not now....
|
You're missing the main point, which isn't that DNA evidence uncovered the not-guilty ones, it's that JURIES GOT IT WRONG MORE THAN HALF THE TIME! You seem to be assuming that the remaining ones are necessarily guilty. No, the point is that the rest of them (who may also be innocent) did not have cases that DNA evidence could affect. It's quite possible that more than half of them are innocent, too, only DNA evidence can't help them, because it wasn't used as evidence in their cases.