Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Soul_Rebel
Innumerable kids are kidnapped, those that get them pass from certain security points with no problem right now; you can see cases of missing kids ending up in other countries.
Can you tell me what are the negatives of having the fingerprint of a child in a DB shared by govts?
I'm all for privacy, but you need to apply reasoning and examine each case as unique.
|
These things always start with some noble purpose such as 'but doing this will save the kids' - the 2257 regs being a case in point. Ok there are not 'innumerable kids' being kidnapped and when they are they are not as a rule taken across borders by commerical means but usually smuggled. I would suggest that children are more likely to be killed, injured in traffic accidents (so we ban cars now?) then they are likely to be kidnapped so please stop buying the crap 'that this is good for us/society/kids' and stop repeating it like you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Govt likes to control. Its the nature of the beast. That is why it does what it does. In the UK for example we have resisted ID cards for generations. It smacks of Nazi dictatorships and so on. We are told that everyone else has them and it will fight terrorism (this despite the fact that even our Home Secretary admitted they would not have stopped one single incident in the past). I don't care everyone else has them. Everyone else having them is not a sign that it is a good idea. Nazi Germany had gas chambers and these were not a good idea (unless you are Mel Gibson).
Fuck the control freaks and try fighting for liberty and freedom.