|
The cell phone could be very significant and far beyond petty larceny, since if he called ccBill clients that were stored in it, while working on behalf of Paycom, that might buttress ccBill's claims.
Many employment agreements stipulate that client data is the property of the employer. Continuing to access that info in the form of stored phone numbers and possibly more (since sophisticated phones contain related database info far beyond phone numbers) could prove sticky and make Curran's case trickier than usual.
Corporate intrigue...
ADG Webmaster
|