Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mikesouth
What the FSC lacks and has always lacked is accountability and as such it lacks credibility
|
point taken.. and i would say that FSC is accountable.. its accountable to its members... if the members don't like what is going on, there are many forums where they are able to express that in votes and in various meetings.
If you believe there are sufficient problems at FSC, then FSC directors should be held accountable, and that is done by the members expressing themselves.
As an independent thinker, you could do more for FSC with your constructive criticisms and ideas by getting its members to pay attention to the deficits and hold the directors accountable.
If the directors are doing their job in steering the organization, then the members are being represented.... if they are not, then new directors should be voted in.
FSC directors are voted by the members....... if you don't vote, you can't bitch.
Fight the beep!