GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - 9/11 - Firefighters NYFD say Explosives brought down Towers

Kevsh · 08-02-2006, 03:34 PM

Still, everyone pro-conspiracy focuses on details of the events and entirely misses the bigger pictures:

- When/if someone comes forward who can convincingly confess they were involved in the conspiracy, then let's talk.

- If it was a conspiracy, hundreds of people would have been involved. Consider one second how difficult it would be to get all these people to contribute and remain silent. Can you say "guilt complex?" No one in a civilized society mass murders thousands of his own people without it showing somehow - many of those involved would have either come forward after falling into deep depression and/or be a total basket case by now. Ask a shrink and see what he/she says.

- It's one thing to send troops overseas to Iraq and watch 3000 die over several years, but entirely another thing to purposely launch drones and missiles into your own buildings. I know a lot of people hate Bush, but you're basically suggesting he's in the same league as Idi Amin and Adolf Hitler!

And I stated this long way back and no one ever came up with a credible reply:

If YOU were in Bush's shoes (or whomever else you think planned this conspiracy) and wanted to do something like this, is this the way you would have done it? Why the planes/missiles? Why 4 planes instead of just 1? It's 4 times the difficulty and 4 times the chance something goes wrong, etc.

Besides, they could've just blown up the buildings and had the same effect. Said terrorists snuck in the building and planted them.

But using planes/drones/missiles ... come on, there's a hundred ways they could've created a terrorist attack and this way would be one of the most difficult and hardest to cover up.

Plant a few bombs, buildings come down, CNN covers it live for a month, "we have proof Iraq funded the terrorists" ... would it have been any less of a reason for Bush to invade Iraq?

Or ... it was a cover-up to destroy evidence in the WTC? Again, why the complication? Blow 'em up!

Come back when you have a rational theory on why this mother of all conspiracies was planned the way it was and how no one involved has ever come forward or been found out.

08-02-2006, 03:34 PM
Kevsh Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: TO Posts: 8,619	Still, everyone pro-conspiracy focuses on details of the events and entirely misses the bigger pictures: - When/if someone comes forward who can convincingly confess they were involved in the conspiracy, then let's talk. - If it was a conspiracy, hundreds of people would have been involved. Consider one second how difficult it would be to get all these people to contribute and remain silent. Can you say "guilt complex?" No one in a civilized society mass murders thousands of his own people without it showing somehow - many of those involved would have either come forward after falling into deep depression and/or be a total basket case by now. Ask a shrink and see what he/she says. - It's one thing to send troops overseas to Iraq and watch 3000 die over several years, but entirely another thing to purposely launch drones and missiles into your own buildings. I know a lot of people hate Bush, but you're basically suggesting he's in the same league as Idi Amin and Adolf Hitler! And I stated this long way back and no one ever came up with a credible reply: If YOU were in Bush's shoes (or whomever else you think planned this conspiracy) and wanted to do something like this, is this the way you would have done it? Why the planes/missiles? Why 4 planes instead of just 1? It's 4 times the difficulty and 4 times the chance something goes wrong, etc. Besides, they could've just blown up the buildings and had the same effect. Said terrorists snuck in the building and planted them. But using planes/drones/missiles ... come on, there's a hundred ways they could've created a terrorist attack and this way would be one of the most difficult and hardest to cover up. Plant a few bombs, buildings come down, CNN covers it live for a month, "we have proof Iraq funded the terrorists" ... would it have been any less of a reason for Bush to invade Iraq? Or ... it was a cover-up to destroy evidence in the WTC? Again, why the complication? Blow 'em up! Come back when you have a rational theory on why this mother of all conspiracies was planned the way it was and how no one involved has ever come forward or been found out.