Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Phoenix
thanks man..i always try to ameka joke when i can
now seriously...my formal training? B.Sc. Mathematics...not a physics degree...but good enough id say....and you can quote some dude all you want and ill qoute one hundred others who say the opposite...then we can get our fathers and debate about who made the playground...it is not proof it is an opinion.
the popular opinion out there, and also the most logical explanation is that these buildings were blasted apart....why else would they ship all the material to China without allowing it to be tested? Where did the molten steel come from? Where did the billions and billions in gold go? So man questions you ANTI's dont want to answer
wait here comes looniemansteve to accuse someone of watching loose change again..lol
|
You can group me with "antis" or whoever you like. I'm 100% positive I don't know the whole truth about what happened on 9/11. I'm also 100% positive you don't either.
You don't have an engineering degree, you haven't been to inspect the WTC, you weren't there when it happened. So basically, you're jumping to a 100% conclusion based on second hand facts and opinions.
The funny part of it is you lambast anybody who has the nerve to agree with the official reporting when your information is no closer to first hand either. Do you see my point?
It's no less ridiculous to believe the goverment part and parcel than it is to be "sure" the buildings were brought down by explosions. You don't know.
As far being able to find 100's of descenting qualified experts, that's fine, except a few posts ago you were telling us how NOBODY with any kind of "formal or informal" training would believe explosvies were not used. It took me less than 1 second to debunk that theory.