Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
Lack of evidence. None. Zero. Post what you think is evidence of controlled demolition and I'll tell you why it's not.
|
Works both ways, doesn't it? What evidence is there that your assumptions about the incident are correct? Show me one bit of evidence that Al Queada was behind the attack. The fact that CNN had Bin Laden's face on TV 15 seconds after the second plane hit doesn't do it for me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
How agnostic of you. It's easy to not prove something to yourself and then selectively play both sides of the fence.
|
So, any situation in which you don't personally have decicive proof, you simply accept the government's story without question? Without even leaving room for the posssibility of questioning it? My thoughts about the situation may be agnositc, but yours are certainly dogmatic. I'm saying I don't know exactly what happened. You're saying with absolute certainty that the government's story is true.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
Also, your bin laden tape theory? Thoroughly debunked.. but you dont want to believe that, you want to believe the conspiracy or at least leave the option open. If you want to learn about the real 'truth' and have all your wildest conspiracy theories debunked, feel free to let me know.
|
Please show me the debunking of this tape. There is no way the person on the tape I have seen was Osama Bin Laden. It doesn't take TV telling me that one way or another. Look at the confession tape beside other tapes known to be Bin Laden. Sometimes you have to trust your own eyes and common sense. Common sense tells me that Bin Laden did not get a nose job for the confession video.
Bin Laden on the confession tape that CNN told me was real beyond question:
Real Bin Laden:
Differences I can see with my own two eyes: Fatty Bin Laden (fake tape) has a wide nose, higher cheeks, and his face isn't as wide (look at width of face at eye level).
Bill O'Reilly saying over and over again that this is the real Bin Laden is never going to confuse me into believing it.
This is far from the only thing that raises questions in my mind. The absolute refusal from the administration to investigate is another major one.
Then there's building 7, which didn't have a "20 foot hole" in it, at least not when I saw it burning, from about 200 feet away an hour before it fell. And yes, the owner of that building, Larry Silverstien, going on TV and saying that they demolished that building. Then the 9/11 commission denying that.
It goes on and on. Anyone who accepts the official story before we have a real, independent investigation, is thinking with their emotions, not their heads. You're saying there is no evidence, well, it's hard to prove anything without investigating, which for some reason our leadership has made sure will not happen. What you're saying is the definition of dogma.