08-02-2006, 01:10 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: See Above
Posts: 3,770
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
1) It is not suggested that WTC7 fell solely due to fire, nor WTC1 or 2 - all three buildings suffered massive physical damage and subsequent fires.
2) listing tenants of a building is evidence of nothing. Also, Do you know what was in those offices? Large organizations have offices in 10s maybe hundreds of office towers. None of the tenants highlighted in yellow would consider those offices as large and/or particularly important. Of the highlighted tenants, the most floors occupied by any one tenant is two floors. In downtown toronto, the bank of montreal occupies almost the full 80 floors of the BMO bank towers. I can assure that an office that occupies 1 or 2 floors of an office tower is highly insignificant. Also, it would not be prudent to store sensitive documents (the kind that an organization would want destroyed..) in such an unsecure location - like the 10th floor of WTC7. So your highlighted tenants lack any real incentive to level their building.
I expect you will post something about insurance / larry Silverstein / "pull it" next? Go ahead, im ready.
|
Wrong about Silverstein.... So with tennants like that in WTC 7 one would think that building would have been a fortress, it was discribed that way in many news stories, odd how it collapsed. As for Silverstien I will let someone else question you on that one, I'm sure they will
__________________
Shooting Exclusive Content for over 16 years
You can reach me at [email protected]
I have survived in this industry shooting exclusive for 16 years.
|
|
|