GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

sociology student · 07-31-2006, 06:26 PM

Again, let me re-emphasize -- it is because of this widespread mass conditioning of Whiteness "Normalcy" on society that so many Non-White Women favor White Men more than their very own Racial Male Counterparts in the film and entertainment industry (including porn). A clear example of this effect is evident in Asian American females and their high tendency to be submissive towards White Men, more than Men from other races. A lot of Asian women have been unnaturally conditioned by the White Man's perspective through his media for a very long time. This is NOT a natural thing. Let me repeat, it is NOT A NATURAL TENDENCY for the majority of Asian women (and women in general) to be most submissive towards White Men more than any other Man belonging to any other race. In truth, this tendency is an UNNATURAL CONDITION installed by way of Cultural Imperialism maintained by persistent Whiteness imagery that is spread through the White Male owned media and through the process of ethnic cleansing evident in Global European Imperialism/colonialism from past centuries.

Women catering to white men more than with non-white men onscreen (Please keep in mind that this is a manipulated tendency in many women. It is NOT a natural tendency, because it is a MANIPULATED behavior caused by subconscious Mass Conditioning from the predominantly White Male Owned Media) :

Observations have also been made on the fact that most Non-White actresses in western media have kissed and made out with White Men in movies, commercials, fashion, etc. more than they ever have with Non-White men in those same fields of entertainment. The pattern of White male protagonists usually outnumbering Non-White male protagonists in films (especially romantic films) while pairing up with women (whether those women are Asian, Black, Latina, White, or Multi-racial, etc.) might be suspect in the current movie and/or television careers of Jessica Alba, Tia Carrere, Thandie Newton, Jennifer Lopez, Jennifer Aniston, and Kristin Laura Kreuk to name a just a few. Again, there are just too many of these "coincidences" to list them all here.

Such "coincidental" observations are considered to be too consistent and widespread amongst the majority of female stars in the entire entertainment business as well. Many believe that these women for the most part, usually do sex scenes with White men onscreen much more than with Non-White men. There may also be another disturbing pattern which is gaining the attention of the public. That pattern is described as having White men doing love scenes with Non-White women in action movies more than Non-White men (especially Asian men) do love scenes with the women of their same race in western romantic films. Here is a listing of various movies, television shows, or onscreen projects which have some of Hollywood's leading ladies romantically pairing up with White male protagonists only:

Jennifer Lopez

· Maid in Manhattan
· Shall We Dance?
· Monster in Law
· The Wedding Planner
· Gigli
· Angel Eyes

Jessica Alba

· Into the Blue
· Sin City
· Idle Hands
· The Sleeping Dictionary
· Fantastic Four
· Dark Angel

Note: Jessica Alba has been paired romantically with a Non-White male character before in the movie "Honey" (2003_. Mekhi Phifer (a Black actor) played "Chaz" who was romantically involved with Jessica's character "Honey Daniels" and Tia Carrere has been romantically paired in a recent film titled "Back in the Day". However, there are still too many females (including Jessica Alba who never (on a consistent basis) are romantically paired up or cast as intimate characters for Non-White male characters in any of the majority of their movies, television shows, or onscreen projects. Jennifer Lopez has been known to have gotten intimate with many Non-White men in many of her onscreen projects throughout her entertainment career; although for the most part, her romantic films have her only pairing up with White men (and she has done at least 6 romantic films in recent years).

It is also because of the Mass Media that so many false negative stereotypes have been used on so many social groups in today's world. Of course whether negative stereotypes are sometimes only intended to be jokes or not, they usually have severe ramifications on society because they influence the the direction of social identities on people's perceptions. This negative dynamic is termed "STEREOTYPE THREAT" and such facts are irrefutable -- again, they cannot be debated, as they have been consistently documented, reviewed, and archived by highly credible top Universities for many many years. Do a google on the term "Stereotype Threat".

As you can see based on the academic sources above, the repetition of negative images and portrayals of Non-White people not only greatly affects many Non-White people's self-esteem and esteem for their own race -- which in turn may affect their abilities to succeed in society, it also greatly establishes the underlying social standard identified as "White Privilege". Do a google on the term "White Privilege".

You can research the subtlety of "Whiteness" and its unnatural mass conditioning on humanity's perception that said race is subconsiously perceived as the "Standards for Humanity". Simply put, it has corrupted the very fabric of the human consensus on race equality: ). Below is an excerpt from the paper titled "Whiteness in America: a State of Racelessness and Culturelessness"(read carefully and take those points to heart):

Whites are the "standard" humans against which all other humans are compared:

An example of how Westerners see themselves as the norm for humanity is our usage of the term "world music" - often used to refer to music originating outside Western Europe/USA. It makes one think that Western Europe/USA is not part of the world. Western music is "default, normal" music. Other music is "world music." The use of term "international student", referring to foreign student, follows the same logic. One can only conclude that the U.S. is not part of the "international" scene, and that each foreign student belongs fully to the "international scene", not just to his/her individual country.

Another term whose common usage I find annoying is "tribe" or "tribal". A tribe is a unit of political organization - the number 1 definition for "tribe" in Webster's dictionary is "esp. among preliterate peoples, a group of persons, families, or clans believed to be descended from a common ancestor and forming a close community under a leader, or chief." In casual American conversation, the word "tribal" has little to do with political organization. You hear phrases like "tribal music", "tribal clothing" and "tribal dance", which beg the question, "which tribe?"

If you look at the context in which the word "tribal" was used thus, you would find that the speakers are almost always talking about African, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander or aboriginal Australian cultures. While tribal affiliations sometimes exist, or did exist in these cultures, it must be remembered that Europeans organized themselves as tribes too. In fact, the word "tribe" originated from the 3 groups into which Romans were originally divided. The everyday use of "tribe" and "tribal" in American speech has become so tainted with the image of the primitive savage that some Americans of African descent have asked that the word "tribe" not be used in referring to African descent groups, preferring the phrase "ethnic group".

When we talk about "ethnic" food, we commonly mean non-European food, like Indian food, Mexican food and Vietnamese food. We usually don't call French food or Irish food "ethnic food". It seems like we think whites don't have ethnicity. This attitude amazes me and I have always wondered where it comes from.

One Drop of Blood proposes that since the frontier days, "racelessness" has been the prerequisite towards becoming truly American. Paradoxically, it was at the same time taken for granted that the true American can only be white. Malcolmson describes the contradiction:

... only "white" immigrants were eligible for citizenship. When Brandeis said that the United States alone "recognizes racial equality as an essential of full human liberty," he immediately followed with, "It has, therefore, given like welcome to all the peoples of Europe."... Americanizers did not, however, advocate a white America. Neither did Brandeis...Americanizers were against racial identity... Races were what European immigrants had and would go beyond... To be American was to be raceless... The people who, by general consensus, had races... were non-whites.

If anyone here has not yet read the book "One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race" by Scott Malcolmson, you should really do so since it does address the issue very clearly. It addresses the racial identity in America and the underlying established social norm that is "Whiteness" and "White Racelessness" -- a destructive mentality that is often subconsiously accepted by the masses as the standard for Americans and Humanity in general. The book also addresses the subject about the term "Colored People" for "Non-White People" being used to condition society in order to specialize "Whites" as being colorless and therefore the default standard for general society.

"One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race" addresses the very subject of the Construction of "Whiteness" and its infiltration into general society posing as the underlying standard and norm for humanity.

Continued....

07-31-2006, 06:26 PM
sociology student Registered User Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 5	Again, let me re-emphasize -- it is because of this widespread mass conditioning of Whiteness "Normalcy" on society that so many Non-White Women favor White Men more than their very own Racial Male Counterparts in the film and entertainment industry (including porn). A clear example of this effect is evident in Asian American females and their high tendency to be submissive towards White Men, more than Men from other races. A lot of Asian women have been unnaturally conditioned by the White Man's perspective through his media for a very long time. This is NOT a natural thing. Let me repeat, it is NOT A NATURAL TENDENCY for the majority of Asian women (and women in general) to be most submissive towards White Men more than any other Man belonging to any other race. In truth, this tendency is an UNNATURAL CONDITION installed by way of Cultural Imperialism maintained by persistent Whiteness imagery that is spread through the White Male owned media and through the process of ethnic cleansing evident in Global European Imperialism/colonialism from past centuries. Women catering to white men more than with non-white men onscreen (Please keep in mind that this is a manipulated tendency in many women. It is NOT a natural tendency, because it is a MANIPULATED behavior caused by subconscious Mass Conditioning from the predominantly White Male Owned Media) : Observations have also been made on the fact that most Non-White actresses in western media have kissed and made out with White Men in movies, commercials, fashion, etc. more than they ever have with Non-White men in those same fields of entertainment. The pattern of White male protagonists usually outnumbering Non-White male protagonists in films (especially romantic films) while pairing up with women (whether those women are Asian, Black, Latina, White, or Multi-racial, etc.) might be suspect in the current movie and/or television careers of Jessica Alba, Tia Carrere, Thandie Newton, Jennifer Lopez, Jennifer Aniston, and Kristin Laura Kreuk to name a just a few. Again, there are just too many of these "coincidences" to list them all here. Such "coincidental" observations are considered to be too consistent and widespread amongst the majority of female stars in the entire entertainment business as well. Many believe that these women for the most part, usually do sex scenes with White men onscreen much more than with Non-White men. There may also be another disturbing pattern which is gaining the attention of the public. That pattern is described as having White men doing love scenes with Non-White women in action movies more than Non-White men (especially Asian men) do love scenes with the women of their same race in western romantic films. Here is a listing of various movies, television shows, or onscreen projects which have some of Hollywood's leading ladies romantically pairing up with White male protagonists only: Jennifer Lopez · Maid in Manhattan · Shall We Dance? · Monster in Law · The Wedding Planner · Gigli · Angel Eyes Jessica Alba · Into the Blue · Sin City · Idle Hands · The Sleeping Dictionary · Fantastic Four · Dark Angel Note: Jessica Alba has been paired romantically with a Non-White male character before in the movie "Honey" (2003_. Mekhi Phifer (a Black actor) played "Chaz" who was romantically involved with Jessica's character "Honey Daniels" and Tia Carrere has been romantically paired in a recent film titled "Back in the Day". However, there are still too many females (including Jessica Alba who never (on a consistent basis) are romantically paired up or cast as intimate characters for Non-White male characters in any of the majority of their movies, television shows, or onscreen projects. Jennifer Lopez has been known to have gotten intimate with many Non-White men in many of her onscreen projects throughout her entertainment career; although for the most part, her romantic films have her only pairing up with White men (and she has done at least 6 romantic films in recent years). It is also because of the Mass Media that so many false negative stereotypes have been used on so many social groups in today's world. Of course whether negative stereotypes are sometimes only intended to be jokes or not, they usually have severe ramifications on society because they influence the the direction of social identities on people's perceptions. This negative dynamic is termed "STEREOTYPE THREAT" and such facts are irrefutable -- again, they cannot be debated, as they have been consistently documented, reviewed, and archived by highly credible top Universities for many many years. Do a google on the term "Stereotype Threat". As you can see based on the academic sources above, the repetition of negative images and portrayals of Non-White people not only greatly affects many Non-White people's self-esteem and esteem for their own race -- which in turn may affect their abilities to succeed in society, it also greatly establishes the underlying social standard identified as "White Privilege". Do a google on the term "White Privilege". You can research the subtlety of "Whiteness" and its unnatural mass conditioning on humanity's perception that said race is subconsiously perceived as the "Standards for Humanity". Simply put, it has corrupted the very fabric of the human consensus on race equality: ). Below is an excerpt from the paper titled "Whiteness in America: a State of Racelessness and Culturelessness"(read carefully and take those points to heart): Whites are the "standard" humans against which all other humans are compared: An example of how Westerners see themselves as the norm for humanity is our usage of the term "world music" - often used to refer to music originating outside Western Europe/USA. It makes one think that Western Europe/USA is not part of the world. Western music is "default, normal" music. Other music is "world music." The use of term "international student", referring to foreign student, follows the same logic. One can only conclude that the U.S. is not part of the "international" scene, and that each foreign student belongs fully to the "international scene", not just to his/her individual country. Another term whose common usage I find annoying is "tribe" or "tribal". A tribe is a unit of political organization - the number 1 definition for "tribe" in Webster's dictionary is "esp. among preliterate peoples, a group of persons, families, or clans believed to be descended from a common ancestor and forming a close community under a leader, or chief." In casual American conversation, the word "tribal" has little to do with political organization. You hear phrases like "tribal music", "tribal clothing" and "tribal dance", which beg the question, "which tribe?" If you look at the context in which the word "tribal" was used thus, you would find that the speakers are almost always talking about African, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander or aboriginal Australian cultures. While tribal affiliations sometimes exist, or did exist in these cultures, it must be remembered that Europeans organized themselves as tribes too. In fact, the word "tribe" originated from the 3 groups into which Romans were originally divided. The everyday use of "tribe" and "tribal" in American speech has become so tainted with the image of the primitive savage that some Americans of African descent have asked that the word "tribe" not be used in referring to African descent groups, preferring the phrase "ethnic group". When we talk about "ethnic" food, we commonly mean non-European food, like Indian food, Mexican food and Vietnamese food. We usually don't call French food or Irish food "ethnic food". It seems like we think whites don't have ethnicity. This attitude amazes me and I have always wondered where it comes from. One Drop of Blood proposes that since the frontier days, "racelessness" has been the prerequisite towards becoming truly American. Paradoxically, it was at the same time taken for granted that the true American can only be white. Malcolmson describes the contradiction: ... only "white" immigrants were eligible for citizenship. When Brandeis said that the United States alone "recognizes racial equality as an essential of full human liberty," he immediately followed with, "It has, therefore, given like welcome to all the peoples of Europe."... Americanizers did not, however, advocate a white America. Neither did Brandeis...Americanizers were against racial identity... Races were what European immigrants had and would go beyond... To be American was to be raceless... The people who, by general consensus, had races... were non-whites. If anyone here has not yet read the book "One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race" by Scott Malcolmson, you should really do so since it does address the issue very clearly. It addresses the racial identity in America and the underlying established social norm that is "Whiteness" and "White Racelessness" -- a destructive mentality that is often subconsiously accepted by the masses as the standard for Americans and Humanity in general. The book also addresses the subject about the term "Colored People" for "Non-White People" being used to condition society in order to specialize "Whites" as being colorless and therefore the default standard for general society. "One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race" addresses the very subject of the Construction of "Whiteness" and its infiltration into general society posing as the underlying standard and norm for humanity. Continued....