Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
Actually I notice that your aggressive abuse gets worse the more your argument unravels. Ok lets take this from the top. You stated that 'no modern skyscraper has been destroyed by fire' Quote:
" the Windsor building fire in 2005, which destroyed the emblematic 28-story tower in the heart of Madrid's business district"
The skyscraper was destroyed by fire. Firefighters managed to put out the blaze and again I quote "Emergency services are now concerned about the burned building collapsing to the ground" If the blaze had gone unchecked the building would have collapsed. There are also quotes about the top 'melting like a candle' from the emergency services but we have enough to be going on with for now.
So after the fire we are left with a burnt out shell which the emergency services were concerned would collapse and which everyone is agreed has been destroyed by fire.
I mean precisely what do you think destroyed the building? Perhaps you consider a burnt out shell as not being destroyed?
Either a building is destroyed or it is not. You have stated with increasing hysteria that I could not find a modern skyscraper that has been destroyed by fire because it is impossible. So I find one destroyed by fire and cue another bout of hysteria
|
Ya know what tommy? As much as I love destroying you and your posts, this is really getting sad? oh well, here goes again. If my house is ?destroyed? by fire, does that mean that it?s completely destroyed? Does that mean it?s collapsed? Guess what buddy? IT DOESN?T! There are plenty of houses destroyed by fire that are still standing. Guess what the difference between that context of ?destroy? and my context of destroyed was little friend? Building #7 was UTTERLY destroyed by fire, as in IT COLLAPSED. If you had posted a link or a story about a modern STEEL SKYSCRAPER falling to fire, I would have clapped for you? instead you posted about the Madrid skyscraper lmao? And guess what my dearest cum guzzler:
The Madrid skyscraper did NOT collapse. Even after burning for almost THIRTY FUCKING HOURS it DID NOT COLLAPSE. Building #7 fell after *just* seven hours. That is the difference tom tom. Building #7 Collapsed. Madrid Skyscraper DID NOT FALL. My dearest tom, what don't you get about NO MODERN SKYSCRAPER IN HISTORY HAS COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE. None. Zip. Nada. So buddy, PLEASE stop making yourself look like a fool. I really do love tearing you apart here but you are just looking sillier and sillier from all the stupid shit you get wrong.
Building #7 and the Twin WTC towers have been the *only* skyscrapers in HISTORY to fall to flames. The Madrid building, need I remind you again, still STOOD after 26 hours of burning. IT DID NOT FALL you stupid fucking CUNT. Destroyed in the context I?ve been using which I?ve stated FROM THE BEGINNING of our little talks is defined by Building #7 COLLAPSING to the ground in the same manor that the WTC twins did.
To be honest you are really starting to bore me with your drivel. You post on here faulty analogy after analogy, claim after claim and each time I shoot you down and you keep pulling shit out of thin air. There are *no*, I repeat, NO modern skyscrapers in history that have fell to fire. None. You lied and tried to say that the Madrid tower suffered the same fate as Building #7. You made an entire post about it for Jesus fucking sake. After I shot you down you retort to saying something like ?lol destroyed is destroyed LOL?. You are so moronic that it?s not even funny any more little buddy. But I digress.
Simply put tom tom,
YOU ARE WRONG. You posted false information, and you are a liar. The Madrid building STILL STOOD STRONG after THIRTY HOURS of BURNING. You sir are a moron, a liar, and you really should be applying for a job at the Bush Administration: They need more assclowns like you to cover for their ass.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
What the entire 29 floors were left standing and intact? Just a few scorch marks which a lick of paint would cover up perhaps. No concerns about structural integrity being fataly compromised or steel columns melted into nothing?
|
Yes, the building was intact and standing. I guess due to your reading disorder you missed what I posted seven thousand times in our last little bout. Here ya go again you stupid faggot and if I were you I would really read it. It?s even bold for fuck sake.
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire. "
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp?page=1095
Twenty-Six hours later that building was still standing strong. Guess that Madrid building was made out of some kinda of futuristic alien material eh? Oh wait steel? Just like the rest of the skyscrapers that have caught on fire and yet none until 9-11 fell due to fire? JESUS CHRIST ALERT THE INTERNETS.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
Yep looks fine to me too. Does seem to be melting in the fire though. But I am sure it will be fine. No need to panic. Modern skyscrapers cannot be destroyed by fire.
|
That is correct, modern skyscrapers cannot collapse due to fire alone. Thanks for pointing out your own stupidity there buddy, saves me some typing.
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire. "
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp?page=1095
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
Absolutely. If we just move a couple of pot plants around in the lobby in the morning no one will notice the burn mark on the carpets.
|
I guess you missed this again:
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire. "
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp?page=1095
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
But back to where this all started. You said modern skyscrapers cannot be destroyed by fire. The one in Madrid was destroyed by fire.
|
No, I?ve said since the beginning no modern skyscraper has fell due to fire alone. The one in Madrid was NOT destroyed by fire. Here ya go Bush Buddy, just in case you missed it one last time:
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire. "
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp?page=1095