Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notabook
Ok Tommy? now this is going to hurt you way more than it hurts me. Actually it?ll probably make you cry. Here?s the thing Tommy: The skyscraper was not destroyed. OMG no, please don?t start rambling quite yet. You see tom tom, you should have really re-read prior to posting that. You really should have. And here we go?
THE SKYSCRAPER DID NOT COLLAPSE you STUPID MOTHER FUCKING MORONIC FOOL. DID YOU EVEN READ THAT??? DID YOU MORONIC TOM???? Do you NOT UNDERSTAND THIS AT ALL? Building #7 COLLAPSED TO THE FUCKING GROUND. IT COLLAPSED! THE MADRID BUILDING DID NOT COLLAPSE YOU FUCKING MORON.
Now that we have the unpleasantries out of the way, I never left. I went to work. You know, a job. Ya dig faggot?
Just a quote for your stupid fucking moronic ass:
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire."
That?s right, it withstood after twenty six hours, it DID NOT COLLAPSE. So lie more out your ass you gay mother fucker. Click the link below, quote is right near the top if YOU CAN READ THIS YOU STUPID CUNT.
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp?page=1095
Read my above post you stupid cunt. Fire cannot destroy a modern skyscraper. You lied and said the Madrid building was destroyed by fire which simply isn?t true. The link again, just for you little tommy boy since you have that whole reading problem:
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp?page=1095
It clearly states that the Madrid building which you were so proud and so sure of that fell to fire:
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire. "
Unlike building #7 which COLLAPSED TO THE MOTHER FUCKING ROUND. So again, I hope everyone by now knows what a total stupid fucking asshat you are and that you clearly have a READING DISABILITY. |
Actually I notice that your aggressive abuse gets worse the more your argument unravels. Ok lets take this from the top. You stated that 'no modern skyscraper has been destroyed by fire' Quote:
" the Windsor building fire in 2005, which destroyed the emblematic 28-story tower in the heart of Madrid's business district"
The skyscraper was destroyed by fire. Firefighters managed to put out the blaze and again I quote "Emergency services are now concerned about the burned building collapsing to the ground" If the blaze had gone unchecked the building would have collapsed. There are also quotes about the top 'melting like a candle' from the emergency services but we have enough to be going on with for now.
So after the fire we are left with a burnt out shell which the emergency services were concerned would collapse and which everyone is agreed has been destroyed by fire.
I mean precisely what do you think destroyed the building? Perhaps you consider a burnt out shell as not being destroyed?
Either a building is destroyed or it is not. You have stated with increasing hysteria that I could not find a modern skyscraper that has been destroyed by fire because it is impossible. So I find one destroyed by fire and cue another bout of hysteria
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notabook
Dude, I love you so much now that you?ve totally been shot down. You lied about the Madrid skyscraper? well let me rephrase that. You didn?t lie but you just didn?t read it either. Man I love having fun with you tommy boy, I?ll keep doing quotes for you to just show what a complete dipshit moron you really are:
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire. "
Ah? it?s great isn?t it tommy? One more time just for you little buddy.
"Landmark 29-floor tower on Madrid skyline remained standing despite a 26-hour, multiple-floor fire. "
|
What the entire 29 floors were left standing and intact? Just a few scorch marks which a lick of paint would cover up perhaps. No concerns about structural integrity being fataly compromised or steel columns melted into nothing?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notabook
Eh, not worth respond to. Your whole ranting and rambling was based on the assumption that the skyscraper was destroyed in Madrid. It wasn?t.
|
Yep looks fine to me too. Does seem to be melting in the fire though. But I am sure it will be fine. No need to panic. Modern skyscrapers cannot be destroyed by fire.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notabook
Oh and just in case anyone missed it:
Tommy lied and said that the Madrid skyscraper was destroyed by fire. Guess what? Just another lie by this raving lunatic.
|
Absolutely. If we just move a couple of pot plants around in the lobby in the morning no one will notice the burn mark on the carpets.
But back to where this all started. You said modern skyscrapers cannot be destroyed by fire. The one in Madrid was destroyed by fire.