View Single Post
Old 07-30-2006, 04:17 PM  
FetishTom
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
*YAWNS* One last time for you buddy, think about this LOGICALLY: There in the history of MANKIND during which we?ve had MODERN SKYSCRAPERS, there have been ZERO SKYSCRAPERS destroyed due to intense FIRE. Many FIRES have burned longer than the one in Building #7 (burned for 7 hours or so) for periods of DAYS, buildings TALLER than #7 as well. Considering that everything STRUCTUAL ENGINEERS tell us as well, a building cannot fall from FIRE ALONE. This essentially means that a modern skyscraper will NEVER FALL TO FIRE DAMAGE. Now using logic, what is the most likely event here? That a building that suffered slight damage and burned for a mere 7 hours fell to the ground, considering other buildings have suffered greater damage and burned for over a day and STILL structurally sound, or that it was otherwise setup in such a way to be taken down by a controlled group. Yeah, I thought so. You keep spewing your bullshit Mr. Oreilly, I?m sure someone somewhere is buying the fucking shit coming out of your faggoty mouth.
I just knew you would be back!

Madrid fire services have just announced that the 99 percent of the fire which has gutted one of Spanish capital's tallest buildings has been put out. Firemen have been working all day to try and control Madrid's biggest ever fire. The Windsor building is in the heart of Madrid's commercial and banking center, and it has been destroyed by the fire.

Hot damn a modern skyscraper destroyed by fire. Would you credit it huh? Now I think the problem is you just saw this statement:

"Fires do not destroy skyscrapers."

on the AttackonAmerica website and swallowed it whole and then spewed it out over everyone without actually checking whether it was true or not. Now you did didn't you? This is very, very bad and not a little dumb

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Yes we have already been through this Tom, you do seem to have an explanation though: MAGIC destroyed Building #7. Awesome. I love that explanation, you should totally go work for Penn&Teller, I hear they need a third wheel that will explain things using your warped view of what logic is. Oh wait, that?s the Bush Administration my bad. QUICK TOM! GO APPLY! They certainly need more people willing to lie for them! HURRY THE JOB MAY BE FILLED SOON!!! Moron.
Again going with Fire as the answer.


Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Dear tommy boy, are you a fucking moron or do you just play one on TV? Just checking. Many things in science are not observable visually as in up close and personal ? instead, we have working theories and based on spectrums of light we can come to certain conclusions. Unlike you who evidently believes that magic governs our world and that ?anything is possible? lmao.
Working theories and certain conclusions are fine. Until they are disproved by events. Let me think of an example. Hmm. Oh I know. Some people hold the theory that modern skyscrapers cannot be destroyed by fire but, and alas, this has been proven to be absolute drivel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
It explains I have flatulence. Not really a lot but coming from someone who believes in magic that?s hardly surprising you would think that way.
It does explain you have flatulence. Thank you for sharing. Have you been to Madrid?


Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Tom ? I know your reading comprehension skills are fairly bad, but by ignoring that paragraph you missed out on a lot. I?ll summarize one more time and even capitalize it and bold it for you since you are such a duckweed: IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A STEEL SKYSCRAPER TO BE DESTROYED BY FIRE ALONE BASED ON FACTUAL DATA, IN WHICH EVEN THE FEMA COMMISIONED STUDY AGREED WITH. There ya go tommy boy, hope that helped you out! And remember I wasn?t yelling either just in case you want to try and derail the thread that way. =)
Unless it is based in Madrid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
See previous comments on why you are such a fucking idiotic douche bag and should really get a job at the BBB (Bush Butt Buddies).
Is the job based in Madrid?

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Ok Tom: Let?s try this one more time for you and your reading disability. In our modern history we?ve had hundreds of MODERN SKYSCRAPERS catch on fire. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM stood afterwards. Not a ONE was structurally compromised. Based on this, structural engineers were able to gather data to PROVE without a SHADOW OF A DOUBT that a modern STEEL SKYSCRAPER can NOT fall because of fire damage alone.
Unless it is based in Madrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Garma is a giant turtle, yes that?s correct. You didn?t know who Gamara was so I tried to enlighten you, but with you being a faggotty fuck fuck I guess it was in vain eh?
Unless it is based in Madrid. Oh ok I know that this has nothing to do with giant turtles I just like saying it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Looks like you agree on this one tom tom that because of their unsubstantiated claims that that leaves way for an alternative method to which the building was destroyed rather than by fire and slight structural damage. Can you think of another way to bring down a building my dear faggot? Let?s see? a planned demolition perhaps faggy-one-Kenobi? Glad this is another issue you have conceded with, thanks pal!
Wait for it...



...all together now...



...unless it is based in Madrid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
DUDE keep your eyes off my JUNK, that?s the last time I?m warning you or I swear to god I will take away all of your Christina Aguilera CD?s.
I have no idea. Don't ask. Its just babble.

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Lmao, you go ahead and DISGRACE THEIR MEMORIES by saying that a group of people with BOX-CUTTERS managed to subdue an ENTIRE PLANE. God damn Bill Oreilly you are fucking SICK in the HEAD.
This from the man who sneered at their fate. Go figure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Since you can?t debunk shit using your so-called ?logic?, how about trying factual data? How about finding one modern skyscraper in history that has fell to fire? Oh yeah that?s right Tom, let me save you the trouble: THERE ARE NONE. Keep reaching for the stars tommy boy.
Drum roll please maestro. Ladies and Gentlemen I present a variation on a much used phrase...

...There's one in Madrid.


Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Are you a stupid mother fucking moron Tommy Boy? Wait, scratch that, I already asked that and you gave me a answer with your useless drivel miles ago. You are the one who believes in magic and that everything is possible. You are the one that keeps on hammering about ?Just because a MODERN SKYSCRAPER has NEVER FALLEN due TO INTENSE FIRE that doesn?t mean it can?t lmao I so smart tee-hee?.
I will admit I am incredibly smart. Which is annoying to those that are not quite as smart such as your goodself. oh and...

...Madrid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
It?s the same thing as you saying: ?Just because a GIANT MARTIAN COCK has NEVER BEEN SEEN doesn?t mean that it can?t exist LMAO.?. Your analogies really need some work there little buddy.
Giant turtles now giant alien cocks. Mucho nutcase. This man be crazzee. My name is Juan and I am from Madrid

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Read it twice, you say the same thing. You try to compare religion to conspiracy theories and I shoot it down quicker than the US Government should have shot down the planes full of box-cutter wielding terrorists (lmao). When I call you on it you respond and clearly show the difference yourself, that millions have died to religion and relatively none to conspiracies, which clearly prove that they are nothing alike. I love shooting down your shit tommy boy? I really do
Religion=conspiracy theories. The new age religion is conspiracy, giant lizards (or turtles), the illuminati and things that go bump in the night. And dude my shit is so unthreatened by your poor shooting!

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Negatory means NO buddy. Though fuck? now that I think about it why did I expect you to know that? Sorry about that Tommy, I?ll say it in words you can understand: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrr NOoooo I like PIE and PUDDDDING deeeeeeeeeeeeeeer. That better little fella?
No speak English senor. I am from Madrid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Again, reaching here buddy. You said AND OTHERS, and I said AND OTHERS just to try and keep you up to pace. If you had said people, the AND OTHERS would have never popped up; regardless if you want I could give you some tissues, I know you have a lot of jerking off to do tonight over this thread ;)
Do you speak English?

Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Lmao, nice questioning there faggot, you learn that in second grade? ?You seem to enjoy looking stupid!? so if I try to respond and say ?No I don?t? it still implies I?m stupid, if I say yes then it does. So how about I use your great second grade bullshit right back at you: ?You seem to enjoy being a faggot!?. OooOoooo BURN. Seriously Tommy Boy, you should really stop posting. The more you post the more people can see the giant dickhead that you really are. Giant dickhead? lmao, I bet that just got you hard little buddy
And from giant turtles through giant alien cocks we end on giant dickheads!. Thank you all you have been a wonderful audience and I have enjoyed my time on this thread immensely. I have to go as I have a plane to catch to...



...Madrid!
FetishTom is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote