Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

2 key points stand out here

1) Notabook's paranoid WTC fantasies are not just about jingoism but also about jujuism,
and
2) Notabook has no fixed ethical principles.

So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of the eternal argument about it. Whenever he is blamed for conspiring to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole, he blames his representatives. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help Notabook work hand-in-glove with insincere losers. Easy as it may seem to change the world for the better, it is far more difficult to lead the way to the future, not to the past. And now, to end with a clever bit of doggerel: United we stand. Divided we fall. Notabook's peevish methods of interpretation will destroy us all.