Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notabook
Fire alone can?t bring down a modern skyscraper friend, this is confirmed. So the only thing you could have been referring to in 9/11 then is that no modern skyscrapers have been in such a situation as getting slammed by two jets full of delicious fuel. No amount of nut sucking or dick stroking you do is going to change what you meant, so you might as well stop it. Or don?t, it?s up to you.
|
one last time...a little logic. i am sure it will be wasted, but hopefully it will help you with a breakthough in your paranoia and delusions.
a) you are not an engineer or structural engineer and are not qualified to make such statements as "fire alone cannot bring down a modern skyscraper"
b) "fire alone" did not bring either building down. significant structural damage combined with fire did. you might have missed the massive holes punched in the buildings by the jets. look around, i am sure you can find pics or video.
nothing like this has ever happened in the history of the world... so there is no rational way to argue what should happen or what might typically happen in such a situation.
c) no other buildings on the planet compared to the WTC, either in size or in the unique construction of the towers. with the exception of this event, never in the history of the world, have buildings similar in construction and size been hit by two passenger jets full of fuel.
d) since c. is true... and your argument relies on a comparissons of what "does/should happen" which do not exist, or where none can be made, your argument is 100% invalid and rediculous.
