Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
No I didn't. My statement was directly in relation to your assertion that no modern skyscrapper had collapsed through fire which happen to occur on or as a result of the events on 9/11
|
Fire alone can?t bring down a modern skyscraper friend, this is confirmed. So the only thing you could have been referring to in 9/11 then is that no modern skyscrapers have been in such a situation as getting slammed by two jets full of delicious fuel. No amount of nut sucking or dick stroking you do is going to change what you meant, so you might as well stop it. Or don?t, it?s up to you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
You are welcome.
|
>_<
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
Never said they suffered a similar fate.
|
And the reason that they didn?t suffer a similar fate? Magic? Delicious cock sundae?s protected them from structural damage, but the cock sundae just didn?t quite cover up all of building #7? Yeah that sounds about as logical as what FEMA said eh?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
To repeat. Just because something has 'never happened before' is not a guarantee or evidence that it 'will never happen'. I will quote you an example. The sun has never expanded and vaporised this planet. However this is not evidence that this will never happen. The use of 'what has been the case' and extending it to 'this is the case and always will be the case' dribbling nonsense
|
Did you really just say that about the sun?? Our sun is a type of star. OH WAIT, don?t respond back quite yet faggoteer! Our sun is a yellow dwarf, and because of other yellow dwarfs THAT WE?VE OBSERVED we *think* that our sun will follow the same eventual life cycle and eventually expand and vaporize most of the terrestrial planets. Now, here?s the thing little guy: scientists have OBSERVED other yellow dwarfs that have expanded, which is why they can make the assertion that one day our sun will eventually do the same thing. My dear faggot, we have NEVER OBSERVED A MODERN SKYSCRAPPER falling down because of intense fire, so your stupid fucking quote is about as accurate as I am taking a piss.
-And let me you I?ve hit the ceiling before when I?ve pissed if that tells you my accuracy.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
Then if we accept that 97% of the evidence is removed then any 'proof' you provide is equally bunkus
|
I can?t provide hardcore proof, just circumstantial evidence. Kind of like the Scott Peterson trial, you know the one, where a man was sentenced to death with no real evidence? Yeah, it?s kinda like that. Kinda.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
Have already answered this. Just because building A did not catch fire does not mean building B cannot catch fire. Proximity of an item to an explosive event is a factor in the fate of said item but not the sole determining factor.
|
Already stated previously, etc. Building #7 was further away from WTC than many other buildings. Many other buildings caught fire and suffered damage from falling debris, none magically fell like building #7 did, which means obviously that Gamara used his hard shell to deflect the debris and intense heat from the other buildings but his shell just wasn?t quite big enough to protect #7. Fucking Gamara, I hate that guy.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
Correct. You cannot understand why building 7 collapsed. You therefore fulminate and seek answers in conspriacy theories. The same thinking underpins religious faith and conspiracy theorists. The need to have order and explain the unexplainable. Conspiracy theories are the new religion.
|
I understand that the reasons that FEMA gave are completely unsubstantiated, which leads me to believe that building #7 collapsing was setup in advance. Does this mean that the government was behind 9-11? No. Does this mean that a select group of people knew about 9-11 in advance? Probable. As for conspiracy theories being the new religion, that?s a bunch of shit. It?s healthy to question the answers you are given. Religion on the other hand is usually never a good thing. How many people have died because of religion? Compare that number to how many have died because they delve in conspiracy. Get back to me when you have the numbers faggot. =)
By the way, I really love that big word you used there friend, fulminate. I like it! You may be a faggot but that word makes up for it, god DAMN I love that fucking word.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
You capitalize for the same reason you call me (and others) a faggot. Misplaced aggression due to fear and insecurity mixed with latent homosexuality.
|
Latent homosexuality? I?m a full blown queer (when I want to be). I call people (and others) faggots because I can. I?m a big believer in this magical thing called FREE SPEECH. Uh oh, there I go capitalizing again for your benefit. Oh I?m so silly! Tee hee, tee hee, oh shut the fuck up you stupid faggot and go back to sucking some cock.