@iginally posted by jas1552 [/i]
Some of you are assuming wrongly about O'reilly's position. He asked the woman what is obscene and illegal and her reply was sexual intercourse. He told her she is full of it and porn is not illegal except locally and if people have to go out of their way and make an effort to get porn he doesn't see what the big deal is. [/QUOTE]
Yes, right. That's exactly what happened. The only disparaging comment he made towards porn was something about those "crazy" people who get together to fuck in front of a camera as a duo, trio or "whatever."
The women he was interviewing (I forget her name) was insane. A blathering political careerist with a pussy that must resemble a petrified mummy's. He royally dised her by rolling his eyes and repeatedly hammering against her idiocy by pointing out the obvious 'lost cause' nature of her cause: People want porn, people will watch porn in the privacy of their home or hotel room, and people will pay a premium price for -- so 'hello' AT&T and Hilton, et al. The Feds won't go near this and big deal if some small town in Alabama does, no one gives a shit.
