View Single Post
Old 07-28-2006, 05:21 PM  
CE_Rashaan
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Porn Valley
Posts: 937
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent
well, 4472 and 2257 both target the secondary record keeper requirements, which is being challenged.. AND, FSC is challenging 2257 as a whole (including primary record keeper requirements).


Fight the litigation!
I'm not 100% sure about any of this but this is my take on it.

4472 makes any person who displays adult content on the web on or after the 27th a primary producer and thus responsible for having the neccesary 2257 documents. FSC's injunction is applicable to 2257 but not 4472.

I'm not 100% sure about any of this but that is my take on it
CE_Rashaan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote