Why are we so sure "secondary producers" means affiliates?
I mean, logically speaking, the primary producer would be the shooter of the content, and if you purchased the content, (as in a non-exsclusive paysite or purchased content for your own promotion) which would be compliant as you get copies of all docs when you purchase -- then wouldn't "secondary producer" stop there?
Why do we assume "secondary producer" is an affiliate? If you're using the content from the "secondary producer" (affiliate program), doesn't that make you a distributor, or something along those lines and not accountable?
|