Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FetishTom
That is absurd. If I take an image on a girl in the nude and photoshop a dress on then it is no longer a nude image. If I pass that amended image on to someone else who is unaware of the amendment then by this logic he can be done for not having the correct paperwork on a clothed image.
If what you say is true then the purpose of all this is to make sure people cannot reasonably comply and shut everyone down...oh wait sorry that is the intention!
Seriously though laws that are inherently flawed or designed to make sure people fail never have a long shelf life...
...fingers crossed
|
Stop. Look at your second sentence.
"If I take an image on a girl in the nude and photoshop a dress on then it is no longer a nude image."
So you are saying that if you take a photograph of a minor, photoshop a dress on her you haven't photographed a minor nude?
Your logic also means if you take a photo of a girl with a dildo in her ass but crop out all but her face, you haven't taken a photo of a girl with a dildo in her ass?