GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

Bliz · 07-26-2006, 06:48 AM

Here's another question I like to hear some of your opinions on...

It seems some lawyers and armchair lawyers have based their interpretations of the new laws saying explict content can not be manipulated/cropped without making that person a secondary producer. Making them subject to all the 2257 record keeping requirments. From what I've read this seems to be what is being pushed forward by this fucked up administration.

Question:

What if a image or video cap was from an explict scene, but the image used by those consider "secondary producers" was non explict?

Example:

Using using a image from a shoot or scene before the sexualy explicit activity begins. In most shoots there are usually start out full clothed, lingerie, or topless posing.

I can see where cropping out the only the face of a girl whose actually getting double anal in a five man gangbang could be a problem.

I don't know, but I'm glad I began developing a solution for 2257 the first time around.

07-26-2006, 06:48 AM
Bliz Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: on da beach Posts: 316	Here's another question I like to hear some of your opinions on... It seems some lawyers and armchair lawyers have based their interpretations of the new laws saying explict content can not be manipulated/cropped without making that person a secondary producer. Making them subject to all the 2257 record keeping requirments. From what I've read this seems to be what is being pushed forward by this fucked up administration. Question: What if a image or video cap was from an explict scene, but the image used by those consider "secondary producers" was non explict? Example: Using using a image from a shoot or scene before the sexualy explicit activity begins. In most shoots there are usually start out full clothed, lingerie, or topless posing. I can see where cropping out the only the face of a girl whose actually getting double anal in a five man gangbang could be a problem. I don't know, but I'm glad I began developing a solution for 2257 the first time around.