View Single Post
Old 07-25-2006, 05:38 PM  
GigoloMason
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by marketsmart
ok. but since this is a new bill, i am assuming that the fsc ruling only applies to that amendment and not to this new bill????
The preliminary injunction only applies to the initial attempt to redefine a secondary producer, and only to secondary producers as primary producers were required to keep the records on hand anyway prior to the proposed changes.

Although I haven't read through the new bill yet myself I wouldn't be suprised to see this attempt get tacked on to the initial FSC lawsuit if it really is simply the same attempt at redefinition over again. If you're really concerned ask your lawyer.

Either way I'm suprised that any major affiliate programs would still be rolling the dice on 2257 at this point in time with all the stuff that's been going down of late.
__________________
GigoloMason is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote