Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Webby
IWF don't have "reviewers" - the data is passed to the relevant law enforcement agency in whatever country. They decide whether their laws are broken or not.
|
However you want to put it then. I just want to know how those deciding weather something is CP or not actually comes to their conclusion.
Here in the US we've had cases of people being put on trial for CP when it was in question weather it was even CP or not. The prosecution brings in a pediatrician to testify that the photos *could* be of a child.
Is this a similar situation in the UK? It is awfully difficult to tell if an 18yo's content is of an 18yo or a 16yo. See what I'm saying? They could be going on the safe side and labeling it as CP until they find out otherwise... and maybe they never do find out. So it remains wrongly classified as CP.
That's my theory and I'm sticking to it.