Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Matt 26z
That is why I question how the IWF labels content as CP. Is it blatant CP, or could their reviewers be mistaken to the point of inflating the rate to 36%?
|
IWF don't have "reviewers" - the data is passed to the relevant law enforcement agency in whatever country. They decide whether their laws are broken or not.
Also remember, IWF deal mainly with UK related issues and are not an equivalent of ASACP, but funded by the EU, Google, Verizon, BBC, TeleWest, Lycos and numerous other ISP's and mobile phone networks. They do not represent the "adult industry" as a method of purportedly policing that industry.