Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Webby
Matt... for one, I can tell without a second glance what is child porn and what is not. There is no need to have *any* help from the "adult industry" to know a kid cocksucking a pervert is blatantly wrong and illegal in most countries. The same applies to law enforcement in the US or EU - the world is not stupid
|
Well something is certainly wrong with the IWF's figures. Take a look at this.
The ASACP states here
http://www.asacp.org/press/pr062405.html that,
"Over the last two years, ASACP has received over 150,000 reports of suspect child pornography sites; only 8% of these are new, unique verifiable CP sites."
ASACP:
150,000 reports
12,000 (8%) they believe are new CP
IWF:
14,000 reports
5,000 (36%) they believe are (presumably new) CP
Why is the complaint to CP rate so much higher with the IWF? Do users of ASACP really report that much more mistaken CP?
That is why I question how the IWF labels content as CP. Is it blatant CP, or could their reviewers be mistaken to the point of inflating the rate to 36%?