Originally Posted by RayVega

Believe it or not my attorney came to me with this idea as a workaround for prostitution. I believe there was a technicality that the performance has to be done with the "intent" of public display or pay per display open to the general public. And, with mass customers and the fact that none of them own pornographic public display mediums before hand, there was a feeling that the DA's office could easily prove lack of intent for public display.

On the outset technically it may be within legal guidlines, but caselaw would decide...do you want to be the caselaw's defendant? I'm a gambling man, but I don't want to find out.