Quote:
Originally posted by MichaelH
Morph3us, that's not true at all - more than enough sites (about 200 in my db) allow minimum file at 300kb or don't even set a min. file size. Movieposts which request 1mb+ as min. file size don't pay for the bandwidth themselves, they rather ripp it off from those free ISPs and make sure that those cut jobs.
If most of the movieposts won't rip off aol and all the other free isps, they would finally REALIZE that posting 1mb+ movies is a financial game with the fire and simply NUTS! And it doesn't make a site bigger at all...
Look at videpost-post.com, somewhere in the top ten on sextracker, and he's just fine with almost any file size. Bigger movie files =! (is not) bigger sites.
Also, file size doesn't say a tiny bit about movie quality. You can have a 1mb movie which still sucks in audio/visual quality, but you can also have 10sec clips at 300-400kb with excellent quality.
It's all about original movie encoding quality not about file size alone.
RMG, you might want to check out : http://www.numion.com/Calculators/
where you can calculate anything you want in puncto bandwidth.
Also, i invite everyone to post embeded movies on my site on free-porn-review.com or nice looking galleries anyways.
Greetings, Michael
PS : Even at 20cents or less per gig, it's a risky game.
|
people used to say that about pic galleries too.
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|