Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rankscom
We do want to open "niche" based reviews someday with reviewers who specialize in that niche. I agree, our reviews are not the best they could be in regards to specific fetishes. But there are other advantages by having the same editors scoring each site versus different reviewers.
This is the direction we had to choose:
1. Have the same 4 editors review each site in every niche, then avg the score (for our official review format). This way you have consistent scoring throughout our reviews.
2. Have different reviewers in each niche who specialize in those fields. Problem with that is each reviewer has their own way of scoring that won't stay consistent.
In a perfect world, we have diff sites for each niche with specialized reviewers and separate scoring system for each site. Then comes the challenge of finding reviewers for every niche, and make sure they're good at reviewing sites. Not to mention other training that goes into hiring reviewers.
Our "hopeful" answer to most of this is our upcoming site "pornusers.com", which will be dedicated to ONLY user reviews. Another challenge in other ways, but at least we'll be doing our best to get reviews and opinions from the actual customers. Look for this site to launch in the fall of this yr.
|
I wasn't being particular about your site. I rather like your site in a lot of ways, actually. I do a lot of fetish and microniche site work and when I go to a lot of sites that are reviewing a niche like BBW, for example, it is clear the people reviewing aren't looking at the site the way a surfer looking for a BBW site would. When it gets down to more specific fetishes such as balloons, for example, that is even more clear.
Maybe I should start an agency offering writers for review sites that are familiar with fetishes and microniches.