Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed
I feel that our sites are better today than they have ever been. We've focused for nearly a year on improving the quantity and quality of our content offerings, and adding features and services that we believe our surfers want and deserve. Many of the ideas we've implemented were suggestions from TBP.
That is why I get so frustrated, after "waiting 6 months to be re-reviewed" to see little or no change, or even worse, a reduction in score. I feel like I'm chasing a the proverbial carrot here!
|
Just to make sure I address this...
I got a list of "upgrades" from Sweetums that I addressed in my e-mail you to yesterday. I'm unaware of anything specific that was implemented based on our suggestions, but I may have missed something.
The follow-up review that went up yesterday for
Lightspeed World did increase slightly (from 82.1 to 82.4). I assume you're referring to
Tawnee Stone's review regarding the decrease (80.8 to 80.1) which was done in Feb. The major component to that very slight decrease was the change in price ($20 to $30) for access to Tawnee's site. There were positive comments in that follow-up which kept the score in the 80's.
Look forward to seeing the continued evolution of LS sites. Regardless of anything negative we have to say, overall our reviewers geniunely do enjoy the amazing network of sites you guys have put together and that's well documented in the reviews. Keep up the great work!