Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gooddomains
But from the thread titles on GFY recently you can see that people are actively looking for NATS based programs, there must be some reason for this.
|
NATS had an interesting marketing idea when they came out and played into a lot of people's concerns regarding shaving. So, all the guys that were pulling conversion ratios of 1:1800 or higher decided to blame whatever system they were on at the time and not look at other factors for their poor performance.
I think the newness of the NATs is wearing off and the same guys that had suck ass ratios 8 months ago, still have suckass ratios now and there might be the light dawning on some people that the system used by a sponsor isn't as important as other factors (sponsor saturation, niche, your traffic source, etc, etc).
As I said, right now, I'm doing great with CCbill sponsors, the month before my top sponsor was an MPA3 sponsor, who knows what system will come out on top next month, but I know one thing for sure, I'll never pick or decline a sponsor just based on the system they're using...that's just crazy.