Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scotty.T
Similar points were raised elsewhere, that's why the name was fresh for me  |
seriously fucking shady IMO
a simple search on another wm board (AWI) yielded a thread about him complaining about other sites similar to his, what a fucking hypocrite! From another board:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dirty Dough on AWI:
Warning! for those promoting teenfuns
I've seen galleries around from them sometimes and I though these girls look much too young...
Not trusting it I decided to do some investigation.
Apart from the site teenfuns, they also run the site teensfix.com.
See Whois Teensfix notice the SSL certificate
Now there used to be a underaged site called l*****fix
I though: maybe its coincidence that they both have somewhat the same name. So I looked the site up in the internet archive.
This is what I found in the "about us" section.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030408...tro/default.htm
Now, compare that text with this one....
http://www.teensfix.com/about/default.php?nox=0
Well, another whois proved them to be affiliated: http://www.whois.sc/l*****fix.com
So, This could all be a strange case of coincidence. But I would advice anyone using them to drop them immediately!!
(After consideration I decided not to post the full domain, it is easy enough to find out anyways...) |
I also find it funny that he excluded
http://realcollegeporn.com/ from his cash program, but of course has a stand-alone ccbill affiliate deal setup..
Reported to CCBill. The fact that the guy doesn't even have 2257 info on his site is enough reason for me...
this Dutch guy is scum!
