Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BoyAlley
You hit the nail on the head with that last sentence of yours. .kids is the answer to the problem of kids on the internet. And yes, I do believe allowing children on the internet is a problem.
Of course, no one in congress supports .kids, mainly because none of them are really worried about protect them. Children is the congressional code-word for censorship.
|
everyone keeps saying .kids is the answer which in theory it is. the truth is .kids would only work if PARENTS implemented the filtering software to limit access to only the .kids tld. if parents were that concerned we wouldn't need a .kids extension because they'd already have netnanny installed and filtering out adult content. its easier for the government to force business owners with threats of jail and/or fines to police themselves than to force parents to be responsible for their lack of parenting. parents buy the computer and the internet access yet bare no responsibility? sounds right in todays society.