Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlingDaddy
I know this is a thing for another thread... but when you get a min, let's chat on this. You say their "tracking/stats are total shit" yet NATS and MPA both use them as a primary processor if not a secondary. Just curious. BLING.
|
Using CCBill as a processor and using CCBill for stats tracking are two completely different things. Being involved in both types of programs I can tell you Nats is much better and easier for tracking and setting up campaigns, for both the sponsor and affiliates. I can't comment on the other programs since I haven't used them. You are able to tell where almost all of your sales are coming from back through to the origin url.