frankfortuna - the site's listed in google, and some other search engines currently, it's just that without any metatags to speak of and the way we have some things positioned on the page (not the best they could be for search engine positioning), my results (search for 'rhinothumbs' on google and you'll see) aren't really all that worth while (note the description when my search result is returned on google, it's from the top line ad rotator at the top of all the pages). correct me if i'm wrong, but i dont see this really as a negative as much as a positive whereas the site is already doing as well as it's doing without any help from search engine traffic, meaning anyone with good search engine optimizing skills could very easily have a whole new stream of traffic from search engines, in not all that much time.
bawdy - all of the images on the site are user submitted, we don't have 100,000 images as the front page of rhinothumbs says just yet, we have close to 10,000 however and we are slowly building up the collection as more and more users submit content. if any pictures violate copyright issues we ask that they're reported to us and we promptly remove them however we have yet to have any cases of that, i ran a similar type of system in the past (a hot or not style voting site) in which a lot of the users did submit pictures with copyrights on them and url's and the images would be reported and promptly removed. we make sure there are no visible copyrights or url's on any of the rhinothumb pictures that our users submit. and ironically i've found, the better 90% of our user's all date carmen electra and drive mclaren f1's

.
thanks guys...
[email protected]