Quote:
|
Originally Posted by notabook
Look, as much as I love shaking babies, I just can't condone what this bitch did. So what if the fucking tape was time lapsed? The family obviously suspected something because they setup a fucking camera system to try to catch the fat cow doing something to their kid. They had to have caught something pretty convincing on tape for it to go this far in the legal system, but being that this happened in Florida I'm sure the fat ass whore found a nice lawyer who was willing to defend her.
Did you actually read the quote that you quoted? 'meaning the movements that appeared to be shaking might not have actually been as violent as they appeared'. So evidently she was shaking the baby, just not shaking it 'violently' enough  So remember next time people: A little kid fucking pisses you off? Don't be afraid to shake it... just don't do it too hard. |
have you ever watched a time lapse footage ? everything looks horrible violent and distorted , your reading a quote from a newspaper , you should know that the media likes to use word games , so while they do say "he movements that appeared to be shaking might not have actually been as violent as they appeared" , it could've been read out in the court as " she was simply picking the baby up , the time lapse on the camera made it look like shaking"
setting up a vid cam means fuck all , shit i have security cameras in my house indoors and out , not because i have been broken into or suspect that i ever will be broken into , but its there for security just in case , same could be said for the hidden cam setup
They had to have caught something pretty convincing on tape for it to go this far in the legal system
prosecution thought that they did get footage , but defence knocked it down due to the make of the camera , prosecution just did a shit job in the investigation process
time lapse frame rate compared to normal
