View Single Post
Old 06-13-2006, 11:15 AM  
mardigras
Bon temps!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: down yonder
Posts: 14,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12clicks
not so sure about that. if his decision is based on his grad jury testimony, it would be improper for him to comment on it.

Of course, this is most likely why schumer said anything, to embarrass the proceedings on false grounds.
He can say, "I dismissed the case due to lack of evidence I felt to be prosecutable", without discussing the details of any testimony.

Ignore for a moment that Schumer said the words, do you not agree that the reason for the decision should be revealed? It would publicly clear Karl Rove and defuse the issue, both publicly and politically. Win/Win, for everyone involved, including the American public who should be told in a case involving their government.
mardigras is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote