Quote:
|
Originally Posted by L-Pink
What about the "producers" obligation under 2257? Or is all record keeping up to her? (last question, honest)
.
|
Ok .. For TCP she should of signed a release form allowing her and the producer/photog rights to the images, since she hasn't. She's automaticly have author rights. As for her record keeping on content with her image on it .. Umm yah I figure she's got id for herself.
As for the photog that didn't bother getting ID or a release form .. he's up shits creek without a paddle.
Mind you . if her pics are not Explicit .. and just frontal nudity, Id isn't required but consent is .. if he's to display those pictures in a public forum (print, web, etc) or is recieving a monetery amount for them.
the laws are basicly the same, Record keeping, Consent, Author rights ..etc
We just don't have a bush that wants to enforce unrealistic Rules on us.