GatorB

I know there are dems that are pro-life and republicans that are pro-choice. So who do you choose in that? Beside abortion should NEVER have been a politcal issue. To vote based on that is retarded. Sorry, but it is.

Guilianni is pro-chocie what if he's the GOP nominee in 2008?

Anyone that votes for a republican because "Gore or Kerry or ( insert Dem candidate's name here ) is going to take away your guns" is also retarded. Show you have ZERO knowledge on how government works and that you also believe bullshit TV ads. Which means it's good you don't vote, you don't deserve to vote.

Let's see the fact is Gore nor Kerry wanted to take away anyone's guns. ut let's say a President Kerry did. now laws are passed by the Preisdent theya re passed by CONGRESS. Who controlls that? Um...REPUBLICANS. Are republcians going to vote fore a gun ban law? No fucking way. Now let's say they did for some reason then the law would be challenge by the NRA all the way to the Supremem Court. Now who controls that? Um... that's right REPUBLICANS. They would quickly call a complete gun ban law unconstitutional. So see it would never happen so why bother voting based on that? If dems wanted to ban gusn they would have done it when they conrolled the White House, Congress and Supreme Court yet they didn't. Hmmmmmm.

The 2nd Admendment is all fucked anyways because it's completely misinterpreted and hypocritical. If the 2nd Admendment means what you think it means I should be able to own a grenade launcher, tank, or even a nuke. I can't. Justify that? You can't.

Let's see last one was about 100 years ago. Most states don't even use the electric chair anymore.

Fact is ONE party government does not work. Nazi Germany, the USSR are just 2 examples. Government works best when the extremists on both sides are left out of the picture. Power corrupts, ABSOLUTE power corrupts ABSOLUTELY.

Quit drinking the GOP kool-aid. And no I'm not a Dem, but I was a former republican however.