Quote:
|
Originally Posted by darnit
Sorry, but you are wrong in this case. "Virtual" child porn is legal - morally reprehensible, but legal. It appears from the limited info in the article that this is what the suspect created.
Read about the recent supreme court decision addressing that exact issue below.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/...al.child.porn/ |
True. Congress keeps passing stupid laws with such broad descriptions that define 90% of pornography as child porn that the courts have to declare then unconstitutional.