Quote:
Originally posted by pink_in_the_middle
How is that selfish? It's only selfish if you're using that child to get the father back. It's selfich is you think it's wrong to bring a baby into the world without a father.So what kill all the babies that don't have daddys? HELL WTF ARE YOU THINKING?????
Women have been know to be able to care for themselves and their child without any assistance from any man. We can make it in this world by ourselves. That women who has a baby without a father (because of whatever reasons) will find a man if she wants to. And when that man comes along and loves her and her child he will not care if he has to pay child suppost even if it's not his child.
He will become the daddy. Any man that is willing to take responsibility over another mans "unwanted child" has my utmost respect.
|
We're talking about the law here, we're not talking about when this man suddenly becomes the father because he hangs around for a little while.
HE IS NOT THE FATHER! He has no obligation to pay for this child. Unless he WILLINGLY wishes to support this child, he SHOULD NOT HAVE TO because HE DID NOT HAVE THIS CHILD.
No matter what this says about his character, whether he's looked on as lacking compassion or what not, that is to do with his CHARACTER not the LAW. The law decides what you CAN and CAN'T do and what you are OBLIGED to do. He is not obliged to pay for this child, he should not have to.
Your opinions are sexist and they make me sick.