Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
From what I understand, Libertarians are against the concept of publicly funded education. So lets just say Joe Blow and Mary Blow have a couple of kids but can't afford to pay for a private school education. Anyway, even if they could afford it, I guess you can't force them to spend it on their childrens education. Does that mean that education for children would become optional rather than compulsory as it is now?
I'd be interested in your thoughts. Particularly the Libertarians on the board.
|
Poor people are stupid anyway. Haven't you read "The Bell Curve"?