So following this rationale, you agree that the recent decision by the LA County District attorney NOT to charge 3 defendants of hate crimes against the gays they brutally beat up was WRONG?
I'm curious, what evidence would you require [outside of the race of the victims] to establish or at least claim that the crime was hate-based? Assuming that racial epithets were not used.
Quote:
Originally posted by [Labret]
You are right, they selected their victims without regard to race. uh huh, you just keep trying to tell yourself that. If I beat the fuck out of a black guy do I need to shout "******" every 5 seconds during the beating in order for it to be a hate crime? Pull your head out of your ass.
|