News Russian Nuclear Bombers Fly Into US Airspace

[RummyBoy]

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...ctic/13746681/

Why tease? You may as well drop a payload while you're there (otherwise wasting gas). Get it over with and why don't you both exchange IDEAS? SO WE CAN ALL BLOW UP INTO A FUCKING CRISP!!!!!!!!!!

[CDSmith]

LOL @ "wasting gas"

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by CDSmith

LOL @ "wasting gas"

no its proof they can drop a bomb in canada

[bagfull]

Its the end soon

[dyna mo]

it's like 1957 all over again

[CDSmith]

Okay now that I've stopped laughing and have read the article, and had a look at other news on this via our trusty friend Google I see the OP has reading comprehension issues. No worries, a lot of GFY'ers do.

Hint: There's a difference between flying "near" and flying "into" US airspace.

Nowhere did the article say "into".


Btw, USA regularly flies spy and recon aircraft in international airspace close to Russian and other borders. While the Ruskies may be doing some posturing I wouldn't go hitting the air raid siren buttons just yet.

[RummyBoy]

http://news.yahoo.com/russian-nuclea...145055700.html

[edgeprod]

Originally Posted by bagfull

Its the end soon

Seems legit.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by CDSmith

Okay now that I've stopped laughing and have read the article, and had a look at other news on this via our trusty friend Google I see the OP has reading comprehension issues. No worries, a lot of GFY'ers do.

Hint: There's a difference between flying "near" and flying "into" US airspace.

Nowhere did the article say "into".


Btw, USA regularly flies spy and recon aircraft in international airspace close to Russian and other borders. While the Ruskies may be doing some posturing I wouldn't go hitting the air raid siren buttons just yet.

Exactly. Everything flying OVER much be shot down. Flying NEAR? Don't see any problem with tat.

[RummyBoy]

Originally Posted by RummyBoy

http://news.yahoo.com/russian-nuclea...145055700.html

Smith noted that these were training missions, though a spy plane and anti-submarine plane were spotted among the bombers. However, another defense official told the Washington Free Beacon they believe this is more than just a training flight. The official stated "[Russian strategic nuclear forces appear to be] trying to test our air defense reactions, or our command and control systems. These are not just training missions."

SMITH ADDED: "AND THE FUCKING RUSKIES WANT TO TURN US ALL INTO A PILE OF ASHES!!!!" SMITH LATER APOLOGIZED FOR USING ALL UPPER CASE, BUT REMARKED: "MY CAPS LOCK IS STUCK, WHADDYA DO?"

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by RummyBoy

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...ctic/13746681/

Why tease? You may as well drop a payload while you're there (otherwise wasting gas). Get it over with and why don't you both exchange IDEAS? SO WE CAN ALL BLOW UP INTO A FUCKING CRISP!!!!!!!!!!

anything for a laugh

[aka123]

Nothing new in here.

[aka123]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Exactly. Everything flying OVER much be shot down. Flying NEAR? Don't see any problem with tat.

Russia constantly violates other countries airspace. Well, not the only one, but one of the biggest violators anyway. Although I am not talking about "fly over" that they would make some tourist routes and watch scenery. Usually max 1-10 km into foreign airspace and back.

You don't just shoot planes down like that, even your belowed Russia doesn't do so.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by aka123

The USA constantly violates other countries airspace.

I know that. Do you suggest to shot them down?

[Due]

Originally Posted by CDSmith

Hint: There's a difference between flying "near" and flying "into" US airspace.

Nowhere did the article say "into".

near = airspace the US planned to claim = basically the same as US airspace = It's an attack on our freedom = Should be enough to send a counter attack

It's our only option to defend our freedom.

You need to learn more about politics my friend

[aka123]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I know that. Do you suggest to shot them down?

I leave that to those other countries, to decide.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by aka123

I leave that to those other countries, to decide.

Ok then http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Gary_Powers

[WDF]

Oh if they could only come up with their own material and stop waiting for the official statements to be released.

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Do you suggest we not shoot them down?

We know your preference is unarmed defenseless civilian airliners. Doesn't Russia and it's former incarnations hold the record for shooting those down.

[_Richard_]

haven't they been doing this for over 30 years?

[brassmonkey]

fuck it im loaded and ready

[RummyBoy]

Originally Posted by Grapesoda

"Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return." Colin Powell

You believe this totally neocon hawk. As David Icke once said, "They call him Colon Powell. Why? Because he's full of shit."

[seeandsee]

3rd world war, planet destroyed, people killed, everybody wins

[Roald]

Originally Posted by aka123

Russia constantly violates other countries airspace. Well, not the only one, but one of the biggest violators anyway. Although I am not talking about "fly over" that they would make some tourist routes and watch scenery. Usually max 1-10 km into foreign airspace and back.

You don't just shoot planes down like that, even your belowed Russia doesn't do so.

this. Has been going on for years at least once a month over here. They fly in, fighter jets accompany him, flies out again.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Roald

this. Has been going on for years at least once a month over here. They fly in, fighter jets accompany him, flies out again.

If they really violate the airspace, they must be took down. If they are near, that's just nothing to speak about. Period.

[Seth Manson]

The airplanes are not what you need to worry about. The submarines pose the most danger.

[RummyBoy]

Originally Posted by bagfull

Its the end soon

"In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.

[Roald]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

If they really violate the airspace, they must be took down. If they are near, that's just nothing to speak about. Period.

Not near, IN the airspace. Happens more often. You don't just shoot them down.

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/23/wo...s-intercepted/

"It is not unusual," Ter Horst added. "Sometimes they cross Dutch airspace and sometimes they stay north of Dutch airspace (in the country's so-called area of responsibility)."

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by Roald

Not near, IN the airspace. Happens more often. You don't just shoot them down.

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/23/wo...s-intercepted/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_of_responsibility

[just a punk]

Roald, don't worry. Russia will never nuke your country as long as the Putin's daughter lives there ;)

[aka123]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_of_responsibility

We are talking about invading airspace inside country's borders. Not to some "sphere of influence", that is smaller or bigger depending about the mood of the commander.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by aka123

We are talking about invading airspace inside country's borders. Not to some "sphere of influence", that is smaller or bigger depending about the mood of the commander.

I have no idea on what you - the keyboard analysts are talking about.

[aka123]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

I have no idea on what you - the keyboard analysts are talking about.

Which part is difficult for you? Military airplane flying inside another country, or the part that something like that happens?

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by aka123

Which part is difficult for you? Military airplane flying inside another country, or the part that something like that happens?

Because if they fly "inside" the airspace of an other country, they get Gary Powered

[aka123]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Because if they fly "inside" the airspace of an other country, they get Gary Powered

Or the people in the command of armies and countries have a bit more common sense and sense of politics, than you have.

Many of there "happenings" are accidents in the first place. Especially in narrow places like Baltic sea and English channel. Also popular places for intentional violations as you can say "Oops, it was accident."

[RummyBoy]

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and was noted as a co-founder of Reaganomics. He's also worked in other areas of the US government and has a pretty good understanding of the position. He thinks the invasion of airspace was a strategic military preparation.... well worth seeing first 30 mins:

[Captain Kawaii]

Originally Posted by RummyBoy

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and was noted as a co-founder of Reaganomics. He's also worked in other areas of the US government and has a pretty good understanding of the position. He thinks the invasion of airspace was a strategic military preparation.... well worth seeing first 30 mins:

He also thought Reaganomics was a good idea.

[CurrentlySober]

in russia, the toilet uses you...

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by RummyBoy

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...ctic/13746681/

It's headlines that this that give John McCain a boner.

[adultchatpay]

They are testing the waters. One wrong move and it will ignite a war.