Trump Sex Tapes
 

Oh boy. This will be fun.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/mul...x-nsa-analyst/

Of course they're fake, it's already been debunked. If they existed, do you not think theyd be out there by now?!

His so fucked if its true

Its not true, more fake news

can you tell me why everything is fake news as soon it is against trump and it is not when it is pro trump?

i mean he is the mother of fake news - in 10 month he claimed 1000 proven lies.
i think this is good for olympia

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...=.b2a7bc8f696d

Saw that on FB....... even if it was real, would anyone release it, besides Larry Flynt ? :2 cents:

92% of the media is 100% against him...they've been making stuff up left and right since June 2015. None of which has proven true. Trump doesn't drink or take drugs either

Can you show me where this has been debunked?

I'm not saying I'm 100% positive they are real, but it sure does sound plausible. We know for a fact that Russia would try to blackmail members of foreign governments by video taping them and photographing them in comprising positions... Why wouldn't we think they would do this to well known business men when they visited Russia?

Why WOULDN'T someone release it? You kidding me?

Imagine releasing that tape... The legal issues would be huge, not to mention the hardcore Republicans coming after you with pitchforks.

The whole dossier thing has been exposed as FAKE NEWS

So now it goes from him getting pissed on to him just having sex? Stop spreading fake news

I ain't watching that ...

It hasn't been released because it doesn't exist

look at the database you clown. they prove his lies with links to original documents and original stats.
when trump opens his mouth a lie is coming out.

the whole world know that the biggest part of us citizens know that but a bunch of idots closing their eyes.

it is not 92% oft he media against him - it is 92% of the world.
and that have a lot of very good and logic reasons.

exposed as fake news WHERE and from WHOM.

there is no doubt that there are a lit of fake sex videos from trump around but i can not find in even one serious media that the sex tape story is fake news.

so tell me who "exposed" it as fake news. breitbart ???

RAW STORY?? Seriously? Fake news, much like Occupy Democrats or Wonkette.

Anyone who reads such a site shouldn't be allowed on the internet.

Hey Rochard: ANONYMOUS: ?Video of Bill Clinton RAPING 13 Yr. Old Girl Will PLUNGE The Race into Chaos?


Dude, you seriously believe that a tape exists, but no one released it before the election ? Please explain why someone would hold it and not release it.

The sex tape must be with the same person who has the footage of him using the N word that we heard so much about during the election.

Big money in motion if true

i wouldn't mind checking out melania trump sex tape, of course from her younger days :)

rawstory.com lol

If it was true there would already be a media storm about it.

Who doesn't have some sex tapes out there?
I am sure many people have seen some of mine..lol

Trump though? unless it is an underage girl...that guy could show his sextape and get away with it. he could literally play it...and say..watch now i turn her around and do doggystyle. I banged her good..just like im doing to the economy...and before you know it....no one wants to talk about his sex tape..lol

ohyes, bump for this :thumbsup

If it was true, the video was already screening by all media in the world.

do you really think that IF some secret service or govermnent in the world have such a video they would use it just for fun and post in on youtube?

such a video would have a value as long it is NOT published. after that the bullet is out from the gun.

You are so fucking ignorant.

what do i ignore, dumb ?

You sound just like JoushaMo26z... Amazing!

If it's true, then show me proof...

Pretend you had a real video (stop calling it a tape) of Trump having sex with someone other than his wife while he was married. Let's say it's got a healthy load of piss too.

If you are a trump supporter:

- You would not release it. You would be fine with what you're seeing and think there's nothing wrong with it.
- You might contact Trump, offer to give it to him to destroy it, hoping for a little reward from him.
- You might not know what you have.


If you're on the fence and don't care one way or the other, you might:
- Contact Trump and ask for hush money to destroy the video.

If you hate Trump, you might:
- Contact Trump and blackmail him.
- Contact TMZ and other outlets and let them bid for the rights to show it.

If you really hate trump, you might
- Contact Trump and blackmail him.
- Release the video anyway after you were paid.

If you hate trump and are smart about it, you would have to do some thinking about this.
- How could you remain anonymous?
- How do you know his thugs won't give you a beating?
- How would your life change if you released the video?
- Are you prepared for the attention you and your family might get after this? Good or bad?

There are no videos of him

Holy shit Mark, you actually believe the PEE-GATE scandal is real?

Newsflash: It's fake. The democrats paid for it, as a political dirty trick.

Hillary admitted paying for the dirtiest trick we've ever seen, in violation of campaign finance laws.

So, all you donors to the Democrat party- are you happy about how your money was spent? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

This is completely false.

It's not fake at all. Yes, the Democrats paid for it but that's irrelevant. They paid for opposition research. Just because someone paid for it doesn't make it "fake" or "false".

Trump's sexual misconduct is WELL KNOWN, and well known LONG before he ran for office. All of his marriages ended because he had affairs, and you can just imagine someone like Trump with his money - hookers were a regular thing for him.

This "pee tape" was rumored before he ran for office.

As for this "dirty trick" being in violation of campaign finance laws, no, that's not true. EVERYONE who runs for public office does opposition research. Every last one of them. In some cases they have an entire staff who does opposition research.

I have no idea who you are, but you are just pure bullshit on all of this.

^^ LOL!!! Wow Rochard, really?? :1orglaugh You're a nice guy bro, so I'll be nice here. Dude, there were no peeing hookers. It's absurd. Trump is a huge GERM-a-phobe. No way it happened. He also knows that Russian hotels would likely be bugged. His bodyguard JUST testified under oath. Didn't happen.

Rochard, you claim this was just "opposition research." Ok, tell me more about Don Jr. committing treason for going to a meeting. That was actual oppo research. What the Democrats did with this fake info was illegal for 2 reasons: They took the bogus info to the FISA court to unmask Trump associates and to wiretap everyone in the campaign. That's illegal. Also, paying 12 million dollars for the bogus info, then not disclosing it- direct violation of campaign finance law. And no one admits who authorized the payments. Not suspicious at all! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Sorry bud, the demon rats are massive criminals.

There is nothing illegal about opposition research. At all. However, if it is coming directly from a foreign government then yes, that is illegal. It's not illegal because it's opposition research but instead it's illegal because they were receiving help from a foreign government to win or perhaps rig an election.

The argument about the unmasking is utterly stupid. People who discuss this do not seem to understand how this works. You are trying to imply they did something wrong or illegal when they did not. Unmasking is common and happens thousands of times a year. They did not know who they were unmasking until after they were unmasked. That's the entire point of the masking - The ID of the person is protected until there is a valid reason to unmask the person. They didn't know who it was until after they unmasked them.

Now we are finding out Flynn was trying to work a deal with the Turkish government to kidnap someone on US soil for fifteen million dollars? While he was working for the future president of the United States? But let's talk about what's important - Hillary's emails.

If it's not fake, then please provide evidence other than the fake russians in your head

here is absolutely nothing Trump could say or do that would turn a Supporter against him. Nothing. Nada. Zero. Zip.

People like this - and it includes mindless Clinton Supporters - are exactly the kind of "good Germans" we saw in 1942. It's not even the doctrine or ideology that's the "problem"; it's the mindless belief in "their guy" that is the problem.

Some people still love Nixon remember. LOL

What has Trump done that is so bad other than make believe stuff coming from the NY Times and CNN with absolutely zero proof

The Russian lawyer is not in the Russian government. No crime. She was a DNC plant who provided nothing. No crime, it was a setup. Nice try, Podesta :1orglaugh

You just admitted that the Hillary is guilty of crimes, since she DID collude with the governments of Ukraine and Mexico to sabatoge Trump.

Media, Dems Ignore Hillary Ukraine Collusion

PornNerd, I'm no republican. The Bushes are scum. The thing with Trump is --> NO EVIDENCE. Nothing. Nada. Zero. Zip...

If he's done something wrong, we would all be interested to know what it is. Until then, he won. People need to stop crying, get off the fake news, accept the election results, and go on about their lives. :2 cents:

I sometimes wonder if you are really this fucking dumb or if you are just a troll. I also wonder why you switch to fake accounts so much as if you really think you fool anyone..

There's been plenty of studies that you can easily find...90+% of the media was full on anti Trump during the election cycle...were you living under a rock?

I 100% agree with that! He is now the President and we all need to do what we (begrudgingly for some) did with George W. Bush: accept it and move on.

Congratz to him!

i remember this kind of dumb shit writing and i am pretty sure johnny clips is back.

So the media was for Trump?

She works for the Russian government. Nearly all of her clients are the Russian government.

Yes, let's talk about Hillary some more. But, the emails! Sorry, a dozen investigations and not a single charge.

Yet so far we've charged three of his staff with crimes. Flynn and his son are obviously next. They were pretty much working for a foreign government plotting to kidnap someone in the United States for a cool $15 million.

There is no fake news. At all. All of this is real. There is a massive investigation under way. People are being charged - Not "going to be charged" but instead three people have been charged and will be going to trial. More charges are coming. Next they will be putting Jr and Jared under oath.

After that, guess what - Trump himself goes under oath. You don't think so? They dragged President Clinton into an investigation and put him under oath. Wait until we ask him if he ever had sex outside of his marriage - and don't say "you can't do that" because they've done it before to a sitting president, so there is no reason not to do it again.

LOL @ fake news. Fake news is something that is made up. When people are being charged with crimes, that's not fake news.

It has not been proven as FAKE NEWS.
Originally, it was founded on research paid for by some of the Republican's in their race run-off.
It was never used against him for whatever reason.

Then the Clinton camp found it when doing opposition research and did not do anything with it.

But after the election, someone in either the Republicans or the Clinton camp told the media that it existed and they ran with it for just what it was. With the note that they could not prove what was in the dossier because the sources were in Russia and they had no contact as the former British intelligence officer had with Russian officials to confirm or deny what he wrote. He did not give sources and hid when this went public.

And that is probably why nobody in either two groups made the info public till he won the election. But You would have just as much trouble finding out who leaked the idea that this dossier was out there. One of the segregates for a Republican candidate or one in the Clinton camp. Nobody expected he would win till he did. Seemed irrelevant.

So that is the truth as it has been presented. No matter what some in the media might say. But I think most media would agree with this assessment. Even though nobody has made this complete story of it.

So where are the mindless Clinton supporters on GFY? Ive yet to see any. Pretty much anyone Ive seen here supporting Clinton was because she was a sane option to Trump. Show me one person on GFY who supports Clintion at the same brainwashed level as the average Trump nutter..

Crockette, you supported Hillary, True or False? :1orglaugh

So she had the leader of Libya killed, funneled weapons to terror groups, caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and ruined the middle east, which caused the international refugee crisis.... but SHE is the "sane option" over Trump..? You sir, are completely delusional. Please join us back in reality.:1orglaugh

Ace. I said "PRETEND" that you had "A" Real Video. This is speculation. This is "what if". I said the word "Pretend" in the question.

In fact...

Ace: Let's pretend that you had a 4K HDR 120 FPS video of Trump basking in a perfectly-lit golden shower, with warm salty pee splashing his smiling face, gently tickling his lips as it drips off of his nose, and you knew it was 100% authentic because you the one holding the camera.

What would you do with it?

He is a nice guy. Just because someone disagrees with your point of view shouldn't mean they still aren't a nice person..


It's not fake, but its not proven. It's just something that Steele wrote in the dossier. There's no proof that Mr. Orange loves him some sweet sweet урина.