GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What is better for SEO? Single image Posts or Pages? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1258591)

fairytail 04-20-2017 03:33 PM

What is better for SEO? Single image Posts or Pages?
 
Hello!

What is better for SEO?
Single Image Posts or Pages?
Are posts indexing faster and pages are better for long term?

I have categories and tags activated for both.
When I create page or post it is automatically uploaded to filterable category gallery.

Only difference are permalinks:
Post: mysite/blowjob/sweet-girl-loves-sex
Page: mysite/sweet-girl-loves-sex
Which one is better?

Pages vs. Posts

I'm a bit stuck.
Please Help!

RustyRanks 04-21-2017 12:31 AM

not sure i totally understand your Pages vs. Posts idea, but the URLs will make no difference if the content is the same.
it depends on the content and not the type of page it comes on, so either should be fine if you are posting the same content on both types.

CjTheFish 04-21-2017 06:26 AM

If you're running a blog go with posts.

magneto664 04-21-2017 08:18 AM

post are chronological pages are timeless - you don't create a wordpress with a ~100k of pages - they have a different structure in database - post easy to create over almost unlimited number. More important for seo is a structure, navigation and breadcrumbs - tags are only for users - always use no-follow for tags structure.

wankawonk 04-21-2017 09:15 AM

there's basically no difference (other than how it's handled on the backend). the 'post' url is arguably slightly better because it crams an extra keyword into the URL but any effects from it would be minimal at best.

fairytail 04-22-2017 10:28 AM

Thanks!
 
Thanks for all the answers and recommendations!

Idea was to make large post or page grid gallery - more like picture gallery not regular blog.
I can easy change that direct and half of visitors will have no idea that it is actually blog and that every thumbnail images actually have individual post or page.

and yes, usually for regular blog everyone uses posts, but I had a plan to experiment with pages.
is it good idea to add hundreds of pages regular to website?
wordpress 100k page limit sounds acceptable..

Smart Fred 04-23-2017 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magneto664 (Post 21717916)
post are chronological pages are timeless - you don't create a wordpress with a ~100k of pages - they have a different structure in database - post easy to create over almost unlimited number. More important for seo is a structure, navigation and breadcrumbs - tags are only for users - always use no-follow for tags structure.

Can you explain why using no-follow for tags? I was thinking the tags could target SEO traffic on a specific subject, eg: stockings, hairy...

magneto664 04-23-2017 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smart Fred (Post 21722497)
Can you explain why using no-follow for tags? I was thinking the tags could target SEO traffic on a specific subject, eg: stockings, hairy...

Sorry no-follow but no-index

https://moz.com/community/q/wordpress-tag-pages-noindex

Sexreviewsgr 04-24-2017 01:52 AM

Tags can help seo but is more complicated. You have to create a link juice of on page and off page seo links in order to rank better.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc