Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2018, 10:59 AM   #51
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony286 View Post
Fyi Dems have no control. The gop holds both houses,they did during Vegas and now. The bump stock is trying to throw a bone but it wasnt used this time. I think Trump would do alot more but he painted himself in corner.I read an article Don Jr told him not to do more,they know they need the NRA to win again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politi...ates_over_time

The number of times the Democrats held power and did nothing.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2018, 11:01 AM   #52
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
https://www.google.cz/search?dcr=0&e....0.8s0QyvHEwFw

Most Americans want more control of guns. The gun lobby, which pays politicians, don't. Guess which sides win?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2018, 04:00 AM   #53
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Americans, on this subject, display the vast difference in culture on guns.

The only long-term solution is to take guns away from the general public. It will take decades because it's a problem that has built over decades.

Lockdown schools and the shooting move to other locations.

Mental health can't protect everyone. Even in countries where the best mental health care is available, people still develop problems. Without anyone raising the alarms, without those who suddenly decide to go out in a suicide and take as many with them.

Going back to the Arms that were available when the Constitution was written is a sensible argument. Within a society as violent as America. True it won't 100% solve the problem, but it will solve it a lot more than the tinkering Americans propose.

Do you believe the Secon Amendment would have been written, as it is if they had known then what gun technology would deliver?



Top 10 AR-15 Rifles 2014
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 10:55 AM   #54
InfoGuy
80/20 Rule
 
InfoGuy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,050
School shootings didn't happen until after violent video games made their debut. Why isn't the video game industry being blamed for these school shootings? Is a 17+ rating adequate?

InfoGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 12:36 PM   #55
PR_Glen
Confirmed User
 
PR_Glen's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 9,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
It's funny how you claim everyone else is brainwashed by the media, yet you push right wing talking points..

As soon as this shootings happened and everyone started to see "This one would be the one to break the camels back" the right wing started pushing mental health as the scape goat..

Here is the fact grape.. These shootings dont happen for one specific reason.. They happen because of a combination of things come together.

One of those things might be mental heath, but that's not a issue in every shooting...some happen because the kid was bullied others because he was radicalized by some outside factor..others just because...

Another of those things is guns.. You can not have a mass shooting with out a gun. It's simply impossible..guns is the only common denominator in every shooting aside from the victims and the shooter..

Yet another thing is easy access to guns.. Many guns used in crimes are obtained legally, many are obtained illegally. Yet regardless its pretty easy to get a gun if you want one..illegally or legally..


So we have a few things that need to be addressed to stop these mass shooting grape.. Mental health is just the right wings cop out and the talking point they have obviously reherssed ahead of time..

Actually grape that brings up a pretty good point.. don't you think it's pretty sick and demented that the right-wing had pre-planned talking points to try to blame mental health for the next shooting?

Think about that grape.. They put together talking points to blame mental health and just waited for the next kids to die so they could hit the ground running with their latest distraction.. That's pretty sick dont you think?
to be fair mental illness happens in 100% of these mass shootings as well. nobody sane and level headed are shooting up schools en mass clearly. Unless you believe people are doing these for no other reason than convenience?
__________________
webmaster at pimproll dot com
PR_Glen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 12:53 PM   #56
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfoGuy View Post
School shootings didn't happen until after violent video games made their debut. Why isn't the video game industry being blamed for these school shootings? Is a 17+ rating adequate?
Because then that might to lead to Hollywood and their violent movies getting some of the blame.

The out-of-touch Hollywood elites (with their gate secured homes and armed guards) want to be able to look virtuous by calling for gun control for the lowly masses on the one hand while producing their movies full of gun violence for the lowly masses on the other.





.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 01:04 PM   #57
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 70,056
The problem is utterly simple.

Kids in the US play first person shooter games such as Call Of Duty. (I play COD nearly every day, have for years.) In such games they have access to high end weapons. They see these weapons in COD, in the movies, and they think that all of this is cool.

You can argue that kids around the world play such games, and they do. The difference is at age eighteen an American kid can go out and purchase a fucking AR-15.

In the debate on armed security guards, someone said they have this in Israel at ALL of the schools. And this is true. However, the armed security guards aren't there to stop mass shooters, but instead to prevent acts of terror. From what I've read about Israel, EVERYONE goes through firearms training yet it's very difficult to get a firearm for personal use. The age restriction to own a firearm in Israel is twenty-seven years old.

Just at random, I pulled information for firearms in France. It seems getting a firearm in France is difficult.

The root problem here is very simple - We are handing out assault weapons to eighteen year old kids ONLY because they want one.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2018, 02:08 PM   #58
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
The problem is utterly simple.


Just at random, I pulled information for firearms in France. It seems getting a firearm in France is difficult.

.
yes on the other hand having your head sawed off in public is pretty easy to get involved with so there is always a trade off
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 02:55 AM   #59
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfoGuy View Post
School shootings didn't happen until after violent video games made their debut. Why isn't the video game industry being blamed for these school shootings? Is a 17+ rating adequate?
Then why do these shooting happen only in America?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 02:59 AM   #60
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
The problem is utterly simple.

Kids in the US play first person shooter games such as Call Of Duty. (I play COD nearly every day, have for years.) In such games they have access to high end weapons. They see these weapons in COD, in the movies, and they think that all of this is cool.

You can argue that kids around the world play such games, and they do. The difference is at age eighteen an American kid can go out and purchase a fucking AR-15.

In the debate on armed security guards, someone said they have this in Israel at ALL of the schools. And this is true. However, the armed security guards aren't there to stop mass shooters, but instead to prevent acts of terror. From what I've read about Israel, EVERYONE goes through firearms training yet it's very difficult to get a firearm for personal use. The age restriction to own a firearm in Israel is twenty-seven years old.

Just at random, I pulled information for firearms in France. It seems getting a firearm in France is difficult.

The root problem here is very simple - We are handing out assault weapons to eighteen year old kids ONLY because they want one.
It goes deeper than that. A society that has a large proportion of people, that believes a gun is the answer. Removing guns from the general public is the only way. Someone has to prove they have a license to own a dog, drive a car, fly a plane, etc. But anyone can buy a gun.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 09:19 AM   #61
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post

The root problem here is very simple - We are handing out assault weapons to eighteen year old kids ONLY because they want one.
honestly the only thing around here that seems to be utterly simple is..... like you got your gun when you were 18?
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 10:38 AM   #62
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
Then why do these shooting happen only in America?
Societal illness.





.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 11:24 AM   #63
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony286 View Post
Also a crazy person. Without a gun can't do as much damage as one with one.
Tell that to Timothy Mcveigh...or the 9-11 terrorists
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 11:51 AM   #64
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Tell that to Timothy Mcveigh...or the 9-11 terrorists
Truth. Crazies should not have guns. Period. But without guns some of them may become more motivated to look into bomb making techniques and other forms mass killing.



.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 12:29 PM   #65
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Tell that to Timothy Mcveigh...or the 9-11 terrorists
this is not an argument.

because you can kill someone with a hammer does not mean you have to give them
even more dangerous stuff.

what did change since 9/11 ?
how hard is it today to fly and what a mess are security controls.

and believe me they WOULD forbid to fly if there would be an alternative.

planes are NECESSARY and there is no way to go around that. WHERE is the NEED for a gun?

i mean all numbers you see wherever tell you the same story. why canīt you just accept that USA is the country with the most gun homicides and mass killers.

in all history not even a fraction of americans have been killed from terrorists as from other americans. 9/11 is a big deal for you? ok why are the 100 thousand what got killed since then from other americans are not a big deal ?

in what kind of world you want to live when people seriously discussing to secure kids in schools with the army just because too many people use their right to have a weapon to kill other people ????

you prohibit to smoke a cigarette even outside because it COULD possibly kill someone - so why do you not expect killing from a gun ?

what a fuck is going on in minds what even THINK about such a nonsense ?

there are many many many examples of countries with very restricted laws and they do NOT have the problem - so WHAT other prove do you need for that?
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 12:32 PM   #66
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Tell that to Timothy Mcveigh...or the 9-11 terrorists
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 12:32 PM   #67
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue View Post
Truth. Crazies should not have guns. Period. But without guns some of them may become more motivated to look into bomb making techniques and other forms mass killing.
.

tell me: and for WHAT needs an intelligent person a gun ???
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 12:34 PM   #68
Grapesoda
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
this is not an argument.

because you can kill someone with a hammer does not mean you have to give them
even more dangerous stuff.

what did change since 9/11 ?
how hard is it today to fly and what a mess are security controls.

and believe me they WOULD forbid to fly if there would be an alternative.

planes are NECESSARY and there is no way to go around that. WHERE is the NEED for a gun?

i mean all numbers you see wherever tell you the same story. why canīt you just accept that USA is the country with the most gun homicides and mass killers.

in all history not even a fraction of americans have been killed from terrorists as from other americans. 9/11 is a big deal for you? ok why are the 100 thousand what got killed since then from other americans are not a big deal ?

in what kind of world you want to live when people seriously discussing to secure kids in schools with the army just because too many people use their right to have a weapon to kill other people ????

you prohibit to smoke a cigarette even outside because it COULD possibly kill someone - so why do you not expect killing from a gun ?

what a fuck is going on in minds what even THINK about such a nonsense ?

there are many many many examples of countries with very restricted laws and they do NOT have the problem - so WHAT other prove do you need for that?
a very simple question to test your Logic, pick A or B. which will stop a school shooting tomorrow?

A. another debate on gun regulations tonight
B. put national guard presence at all vulnerable schools in the morning

so this isn't a trick question ... A or B?
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 12:59 PM   #69
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
tell me: and for WHAT needs an intelligent person a gun ???
1) Hunting.
2) Pest control.
3) Sport shooting.
4) Protection.



.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 01:17 PM   #70
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda View Post
a very simple question to test your Logic, pick A or B. which will stop a school shooting tomorrow?

A. another debate on gun regulations tonight
B. put national guard presence at all vulnerable schools in the morning

so this isn't a trick question ... A or B?
B now - no doubt- but that should not replace A and hopefully C as a result from A.
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 01:26 PM   #71
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue View Post
1) Hunting.
well every gun controlled country have hunters. but you nee a licence for that and it will not only take you a LOOOONG time in school - you will be also tested on your character - and if the is the SMALLEST doubt - no hunting
Quote:

2) Pest control.
i donīt know what kind of "pest" you have in your country but we control that without guns

Quote:
3) Sport shooting.
also fine - but with the nearly the same restrictions as the hunter.
and than you lave your gun in the sport center locked and you can go whenever you want there a shot as many holes as you want in a piece of paper.

Quote:
4) Protection.
protecting from OTHER PEOPLE WITH A GUN ????
so you buy guns because the other one have a gun.

than it would be a good idea if no one have a gun and rely in the police.

and sure - if you a a money transport driver or need protection for another good reason see: the hunter.

this is the way it is done in all those countries with homicide rates 99% less than in US.

and as you see IT WORKS !
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 01:40 PM   #72
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
i donīt know what kind of "pest" you have in your country but we control that without guns
I live in a country that actually still has wildlife unlike your country where you have killed it all off.



Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
also fine - but with the nearly the same restrictions as the hunter.
and than you lave your gun in the sport center locked and you can go whenever you want there a shot as many holes as you want in a piece of paper.
I live in a gun controlled country and sport shooter's guns are not locked up in the sport centre. They are permitted to carry them back and forth to the sport centre and keep them locked up in their home. Technically nothing to stop any one of them from going nuts one day and going on a shooting rampage.


Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
protecting from OTHER PEOPLE WITH A GUN ????
so you buy guns because the other one have a gun.

than it would be a good idea if no one have a gun and rely in the police.

and sure - if you a a money transport driver or need protection for another good reason see: the hunter.

this is the way it is done in all those countries with homicide rates 99% less than in US.

and as you see IT WORKS !
So people only commit crimes with guns? What if someone comes at you with a knife? Or are you going to fight him off with another knife, if you have one? Your fists? Your purse? Or would you rather have a gun?

What about an unarmed man simply being able to overpower a woman and rape her? No weapons involved? Do you expect her to fight back only by clawing, kicking and screaming? Or would she be much more able to save herself with a gun?

And if you ban guns for everybody the criminals will still have guns because they're criminals and they don't follow laws to begin with.

A gun ban in the US will lead to a sharp increase in crime guaranteed.



.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 01:41 PM   #73
The Porn Nerd
Living The Dream
 
The Porn Nerd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Inside a Monitor
Posts: 19,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda View Post
a very simple question to test your Logic, pick A or B. which will stop a school shooting tomorrow?

A. another debate on gun regulations tonight
B. put national guard presence at all vulnerable schools in the morning

so this isn't a trick question ... A or B?
Well it would be B of course BUT (also starts with a 'B') define 'vulnerable schools'.

Inner city schools?
Rich white suburbs?
An immediate threat, an ongoing one or a possible one?

I am in agreement with your views on this subject. I just don't think there's enough National Guard units to protect even half the 'vulnerable schools' in this country. As far as I see it every school (and school age child) is vulnerable in this counry.
__________________
My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold (Coming Soon)

Over 90 paysites to promote!
ICQ: 579915163
Skype: peabodymedia
The Porn Nerd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 03:53 PM   #74
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post

I am in agreement with your views on this subject. I just don't think there's enough National Guard units to protect even half the 'vulnerable schools' in this country. As far as I see it every school (and school age child) is vulnerable in this counry.
The President said in his speech that he does NOT want to have armed guards in uniforms all over our schools. It would no longer feel like school and more like a military camp.

His idea was to have a way to allow those teachers and coaches who have experience with firearms and already own them anyway allowed to CONCEAL CARRY on campus.

For instance, that coach in this latest incident. He loved those kids so much that he jumped in front of them and was shot to death saving them. Now imagine if he had his firearm holstered on his side under his shirt.
He could have went on the offensive as opposed to simply dying by taking bullets.

I think that it's a pretty good idea.
I ALSO think that schools need to "harden" up in other ways as well.

Whenever I would go to my kids school...I parked my car, walked onto campus, walked into the school, walked down the hallway to the office where I "checked in" and they gave me a stick on name tag.

That means I COULD have had a gun and just walked right in and started shooting.

How about student ID cards with bar-codes on them. And an entrance at the front where all the students come in through a turnstile swiping their cards as they enter.
And any parents visiting the school would be stopped right there to show ID, walk through a metal detector, and THEN get a pass to go on to school grounds.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:05 PM   #75
The Porn Nerd
Living The Dream
 
The Porn Nerd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Inside a Monitor
Posts: 19,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
The President said in his speech that he does NOT want to have armed guards in uniforms all over our schools. It would no longer feel like school and more like a military camp.

His idea was to have a way to allow those teachers and coaches who have experience with firearms and already own them anyway allowed to CONCEAL CARRY on campus.

For instance, that coach in this latest incident. He loved those kids so much that he jumped in front of them and was shot to death saving them. Now imagine if he had his firearm holstered on his side under his shirt.
He could have went on the offensive as opposed to simply dying by taking bullets.

I think that it's a pretty good idea.
I ALSO think that schools need to "harden" up in other ways as well.

Whenever I would go to my kids school...I parked my car, walked onto campus, walked into the school, walked down the hallway to the office where I "checked in" and they gave me a stick on name tag.

That means I COULD have had a gun and just walked right in and started shooting.

How about student ID cards with bar-codes on them. And an entrance at the front where all the students come in through a turnstile swiping their cards as they enter.
And any parents visiting the school would be stopped right there to show ID, walk through a metal detector, and THEN get a pass to go on to school grounds
.
Arming teachers no but your ideas at the end, YES.
__________________
My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold (Coming Soon)

Over 90 paysites to promote!
ICQ: 579915163
Skype: peabodymedia
The Porn Nerd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:08 PM   #76
pimpmaster9000
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pimpmaster9000's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
Oh lol a survivor of the shooting tweeted that AR15s should be called "Marco Rubio's" because they are easy to buy...

What a burn LOL
__________________
Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
pimpmaster9000 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:10 PM   #77
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
The President said in his speech that he does NOT want to have armed guards in uniforms all over our schools. It would no longer feel like school and more like a military camp.

His idea was to have a way to allow those teachers and coaches who have experience with firearms and already own them anyway allowed to CONCEAL CARRY on campus.

For instance, that coach in this latest incident. He loved those kids so much that he jumped in front of them and was shot to death saving them. Now imagine if he had his firearm holstered on his side under his shirt.
He could have went on the offensive as opposed to simply dying by taking bullets.

I think that it's a pretty good idea.
I ALSO think that schools need to "harden" up in other ways as well.

Whenever I would go to my kids school...I parked my car, walked onto campus, walked into the school, walked down the hallway to the office where I "checked in" and they gave me a stick on name tag.

That means I COULD have had a gun and just walked right in and started shooting.

How about student ID cards with bar-codes on them. And an entrance at the front where all the students come in through a turnstile swiping their cards as they enter.
And any parents visiting the school would be stopped right there to show ID, walk through a metal detector, and THEN get a pass to go on to school grounds.
I'm still not sure how I feel about armed teachers, but I like the idea of having all the doors lock and having the kids have ID badges they have to swipe to get into the building so all guests must enter through the main entrance. Hell, half the places I have worked during my life had a similar system.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:16 PM   #78
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue View Post
I live in a country that actually still has wildlife unlike your country where you have killed it all off.


not true - we have a wolf plague right now - our professional hunters will take care that issue
Quote:
I live in a gun controlled country and sport shooter's guns are not locked up in the sport centre. They are permitted to carry them back and forth to the sport centre and keep them locked up in their home. Technically nothing to stop any one of them from going nuts one day and going on a shooting rampage.
so than tell what the difference is between usa and canada.
are canadians less crazy ? if yes another reason to take the americans the guns away.

in germany we do not have a speed limit on motorways - but we do not have a problem because drivers are trained and streets are good. IF that would be a problem - believe me germany would not be the last country in the world who does not have a general speed limit.

nobody looks here for a solution for a not existing problem - that is a big difference.

Quote:
So people only commit crimes with guns? What if someone comes at you with a knife? Or are you going to fight him off with another knife, if you have one? Your fists? Your purse? Or would you rather have a gun?
i think the answer is easy to answer with a contra question.
how many people you think would this school shooter be able to kill with a knife ?
and would he have dared to go in there with a knife and face hundreds of students?
have you seen this midget? 3 girls would take his knife away and kick his ass.

Quote:
What about an unarmed man simply being able to overpower a woman and rape her? No weapons involved? Do you expect her to fight back only by clawing, kicking and screaming? Or would she be much more able to save herself with a gun?
you will always find situations where you can say "it would habe been better if.."
also there are weapons what are not made to kill someone. gas sprays and
shockers and much more. but believe me - in such a situation would the victim not be able to find the gas or shocker in her handbag same as she does not find the gun.

so also NO good argument

Quote:
And if you ban guns for everybody the criminals will still have guns because they're criminals and they don't follow laws to begin with.
no they will not - they also donīt do it in countries with gun control.
and even with this argument there are 99% less people killed.

Quote:
A gun ban in the US will lead to a sharp increase in crime guaranteed.
.
you are probably right in that and this is the price they pay for centuries of misunderstanding the word "right"

but on the longer view it will change. and a lot of excuses can not be used anymore
(like: I thought he was a housebreaker).

and a lot of killings what happen in this "switchoff moments" where people are killing
without thinking just because they HAVE a gun in the near would not happen anymore.

i mean there are existing examples of a similar situation in england and even numbers from switzerland what had once the most liberal weapon law in europe.

there "NSA" and the people who did not want to give up their rights had the exact arguments as you have.
today, after they went this step, england is one of the countries with the less homicides in the whole world and even when switzerland had not such a problem (probably similar to canada) the homicides went down DRASTIC.

so how many more examples you need.
it works everywhere. show me ONE country in the world where it does NOT work.
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:22 PM   #79
thommy
Confirmed User
 
thommy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland / Germany / Thailand
Posts: 5,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I'm still not sure how I feel about armed teachers, but I like the idea of having all the doors lock and having the kids have ID badges they have to swipe to get into the building so all guests must enter through the main entrance. Hell, half the places I have worked during my life had a similar system.
i think apart from the fact that a school massacre can also be done when they come out from school we do not have to forget all other cases.
what about the church ? also close it and set guards inside?
what about the las vegas killer ? how do you want to protect the people what are killed from inside to outside?

if you compare this problem with drugs - you should allow to produce an import drug because the drugs are not the problem then. the people who take it are the problem.

i donīt know why you people are not able to think just logic in that matter.
__________________
Open for handpicked publishers and advertisers:
www.trafficfabrik.com
thommy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:37 PM   #80
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post
Arming teachers no but your ideas at the end, YES.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I'm still not sure how I feel about armed teachers, but I like the idea of having all the doors lock and having the kids have ID badges they have to swipe to get into the building so all guests must enter through the main entrance. Hell, half the places I have worked during my life had a similar system.
Nobody is saying to "arm the teachers". But the percentage of teachers and coaches who are ALREADY licensed to carry a firearm...it seems foolish to NOT have them carrying their weapons with them in case of a madman entering the school.

I graduated in 1979. And in my highschool in central Florida, all the guys who drove pickup trucks had their gun racks in the back window of their trucks with loaded rifles in them. Right there in the parking lot of the school.
But nobody was shooting up schools then. It wasn't a "gun free zone" like it is now.

I think that's the argument being made for having the 10 to 20 percent of all teachers and coaches who already have hand guns being allowed to "conceal carry" in the school.
It no longer is an easy and soft target.

As I said, when I was in highschool this kind of thing didn't happen. Anybody that tried that would have been killed pretty quick.

BUT...now that killers KNOW that a school is a "gun free zone", it makes it a "Soft target".

You don't see many people walking into a gun show convention, or a police dept. and shooting the place up...they KNOW they will get shot back at.

The President pointed out that these killers are cowards at heart. They don't go after "Hard targets"...only soft ones. And schools are pretty damn soft these days.

Anyway, that's an argument being made by the President.
The only other way to stop this would be to repeal the second amendment, confiscate all guns, and then give it another 40 or 50 years for ALL the guns to finally be gone.

By that time...we will have a lot more school shootings taking place.

Why not simply harden them up NOW and put a stop to it. Then everybody can talk and talk in Washington D.C. about "gun control". (because that's all they ever do is talk)
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:39 PM   #81
Kafka
Confirmed User
 
Kafka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 466
The American Dream.


Kafka is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:47 PM   #82
MFCT
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,489
Do any of you shit-4-brainzes realize that choking was the 4th leading cause of unintentional injury death in 2017? By far, the leading culprit in these unfortunate incidents is food. I need not tell you the obvious solution to this very deadly problem. But I will anyway:

BAN FOOD.

There. I said it. And if you disagree with me, you're a Trump supporter and probably a racist too.
__________________
Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed.
Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location
MFCT is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:53 PM   #83
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Nobody is saying to "arm the teachers". But the percentage of teachers and coaches who are ALREADY licensed to carry a firearm...it seems foolish to NOT have them carrying their weapons with them in case of a madman entering the school.

I graduated in 1979. And in my highschool in central Florida, all the guys who drove pickup trucks had their gun racks in the back window of their trucks with loaded rifles in them. Right there in the parking lot of the school.
But nobody was shooting up schools then. It wasn't a "gun free zone" like it is now.

I think that's the argument being made for having the 10 to 20 percent of all teachers and coaches who already have hand guns being allowed to "conceal carry" in the school.
It no longer is an easy and soft target.

As I said, when I was in highschool this kind of thing didn't happen. Anybody that tried that would have been killed pretty quick.

BUT...now that killers KNOW that a school is a "gun free zone", it makes it a "Soft target".

You don't see many people walking into a gun show convention, or a police dept. and shooting the place up...they KNOW they will get shot back at.

The President pointed out that these killers are cowards at heart. They don't go after "Hard targets"...only soft ones. And schools are pretty damn soft these days.

Anyway, that's an argument being made by the President.
The only other way to stop this would be to repeal the second amendment, confiscate all guns, and then give it another 40 or 50 years for ALL the guns to finally be gone.

By that time...we will have a lot more school shootings taking place.

Why not simply harden them up NOW and put a stop to it. Then everybody can talk and talk in Washington D.C. about "gun control". (because that's all they ever do is talk)
I guess I just feel like teachers having guns may be a road to nowhere. Even if it works and it keeps people from shooting up schools, do we not think they will just switch to softer targets like shopping malls, grocery stores, churches etc.

To me, we need to do two things. We need to increase security in some way to make it harder for the shooters to carry out their deeds and we need to look at how we sell guns, who we sell them to, and what kind of guns they are. I think if we don't at least try to address the root of the problem we are just going to shift the problem to a different location.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 04:57 PM   #84
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
i think apart from the fact that a school massacre can also be done when they come out from school we do not have to forget all other cases.
what about the church ? also close it and set guards inside?
what about the las vegas killer ? how do you want to protect the people what are killed from inside to outside?

if you compare this problem with drugs - you should allow to produce an import drug because the drugs are not the problem then. the people who take it are the problem.

i donīt know why you people are not able to think just logic in that matter.
It's a big problem that is going to be difficult to solve. I agree these shootings don't just take place at schools but we can increase school security which is one step in the right direction. Until we look at the root cause of this and address how to best keep mentally ill people away from guns we aren't going to solve the problem across the board. As I said in my other post, my worry is that if we lock down schools and make then secure, those shooters will just move to other places.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 05:08 PM   #85
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 74,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen View Post
to be fair mental illness happens in 100% of these mass shootings as well. nobody sane and level headed are shooting up schools en mass clearly. Unless you believe people are doing these for no other reason than convenience?
That's fine but not all of them show warning signs. It's easy to say get them mental heath care, but do you have any idea how hard it is to get someone committed? Are we going to go around locking up every person who goes a little nuts or acts strange?

Even if the cops had arrested this kid prior for threats, at best they could hold him for 24 to 48hrs and then what? If he didn't do anything they can't keep him ,locked up..

Even if he were to be put on some ban list for background checks, that only cover ccw's and pistols.. He can still buy a rifle, shot gun, assault rifle or buy from some adverage Joe selling his gun face to face..
__________________
"If Israelis don't want to be accused of being like the Nazis, they simply need to stop behaving like Nazis." - Norman Finkelstein
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 05:20 PM   #86
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
my worry is that if we lock down schools and make then secure, those shooters will just move to other places.
That's possible...but most places are already much more "hard" than schools are.
And even though I think ALL human life is valuable...there is something that is especially hard-hitting when it's children being shot.

I would say that any and every place that is a "gun-free zone" is a soft target for these monsters.
When they put those signs up at public places that say "Gun Free Zone", it's like waving a red flag in front of a bull if you think about it.

I was thinking about this discussion last night. I stopped in at a bar here in Vegas to have a couple of drinks and watch a band for a few minutes.
And I noticed that one of the guys sitting at the bar was open-carrying a loaded 9mm pistol in a holster on his hip.

I spoke to him at the bar, he was a retired Marine and was licensed to carry that firearm.

I don't really worry too much about anything...not one of those kinds of people who are scared everywhere they go. I can handle myself physically if it comes to that.
But I do have to say...that marine sitting there with that pistol on his hip made me feel even more secure.
NOBODY was going to come walking into that bar shooting the place up.
It's a bar that is well known here in Vegas that it is frequented by people carrying guns.

Unlike that gay bar in Orlando where the shooter KNEW he was gonna be free to do as he pleased...people in Vegas KNOW they will get their asses shot if they try that in bars in this town.

I know that's off-topic somewhat, just wanted to share it.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 05:38 PM   #87
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
That's possible...but most places are already much more "hard" than schools are.
And even though I think ALL human life is valuable...there is something that is especially hard-hitting when it's children being shot.

I would say that any and every place that is a "gun-free zone" is a soft target for these monsters.
When they put those signs up at public places that say "Gun Free Zone", it's like waving a red flag in front of a bull if you think about it.

I was thinking about this discussion last night. I stopped in at a bar here in Vegas to have a couple of drinks and watch a band for a few minutes.
And I noticed that one of the guys sitting at the bar was open-carrying a loaded 9mm pistol in a holster on his hip.

I spoke to him at the bar, he was a retired Marine and was licensed to carry that firearm.

I don't really worry too much about anything...not one of those kinds of people who are scared everywhere they go. I can handle myself physically if it comes to that.
But I do have to say...that marine sitting there with that pistol on his hip made me feel even more secure.
NOBODY was going to come walking into that bar shooting the place up.
It's a bar that is well known here in Vegas that it is frequented by people carrying guns.

Unlike that gay bar in Orlando where the shooter KNEW he was gonna be free to do as he pleased...people in Vegas KNOW they will get their asses shot if they try that in bars in this town.

I know that's off-topic somewhat, just wanted to share it.
I too think all life is valuable, but when kids get shot it is more devastating.

Maybe we need to focus on schools first and see what happens then deal with things as they come up. Personally, I think if we are going to find a long-term solution to this we are going to have to come up with some kind of combination of laws/mental health and security. As I told a friend of mine the other day, the idea is that you put a fair amount of hurdles in place that people have to jump to buy a gun. The hope is that every hurdle is another chance for someone to catch the person who is ill and keep them from buying the gun or it gives the ill person more time to think and maybe change their mind. I don't know exactly how to go about those and what those hurdles are, but I feel like increased security isn't going to be enough.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 06:29 PM   #88
DBS.US
Geo Cities
 
DBS.US's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA
Posts: 11,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd View Post
CHEAPER.

How about we make every single gun sold in the US cost $10,000? Now THAT would reduce gun crmes instantly. Make bullits $100 apiece. Solved. Next.
Thinking like that is why nothing ever gets done.
__________________
Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

DBS.US is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 06:35 PM   #89
The Porn Nerd
Living The Dream
 
The Porn Nerd's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Inside a Monitor
Posts: 19,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBS.US View Post
Thinking like that is why nothing ever gets done.
Why? Because it would solve the problem? Or reduce it 1000%?

Nothing is being done NOW except more blah blah blah.

Hey, higher prices means higher profits so gun manufacturers should love this idea. Who wouldn't want to sell a product that costs 10K? There's nothing in the Constitution that says gun prices have to be affordable. There's yer loophole folks. Exploit it and stop the madness.
__________________
My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold (Coming Soon)

Over 90 paysites to promote!
ICQ: 579915163
Skype: peabodymedia
The Porn Nerd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 06:49 PM   #90
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
so than tell what the difference is between usa and canada.
are canadians less crazy ? if yes another reason to take the americans the guns away.
We're probably a little less crazy. Maybe the climate.

But the US has 10x the population of Canada so, yes, there are bound to be more crazy people. They just have to do a better job keeping the guns away from them.


Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
i think the answer is easy to answer with a contra question.
how many people you think would this school shooter be able to kill with a knife ?
and would he have dared to go in there with a knife and face hundreds of students?
have you seen this midget? 3 girls would take his knife away and kick his ass.
Knife-wielding attackers kill 29, injure 130 at China train station

You'll notice that nobody "took away their knives and kicked their ass".

Sure, it was 10 attackers but I bet you a couple of guns in the crowd would have greatly cut down on the casualties.

Anyways. That's not the point and we're not talking about a kid attacking a school with a knife are we? If you're walking down the street at night and three thugs come at you with a knife what are you going to do? Hope that Batman comes to save you? Good luck.


Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
no they will not - they also donīt do it in countries with gun control.
and even with this argument there are 99% less people killed.
So then tell me - how do you plan to get the guns away from the criminals and keep them out of their hands?


Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
today, after they went this step, england is one of the countries with the less homicides in the whole world and even when switzerland had not such a problem (probably similar to canada) the homicides went down DRASTIC.

so how many more examples you need.
it works everywhere. show me ONE country in the world where it does NOT work.
Murder and homicide rates before and after gun bans


Anyways, it's pointless to argue this with you.

But good luck on your crusade to take guns away from Americans.




.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 06:57 PM   #91
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Also keep this in mind...even without guns, England is the most violent country in all of Europe:
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 09:31 PM   #92
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
thommy, read this story:

https://www.pe.com/2018/02/20/charge...et-homeowners/


So you would be happier that these two elderly people potentially end up murdered to fulfill your desire that they be denied guns?




.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 12:23 AM   #93
just a punk
So fuckin' bored
 
just a punk's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 32,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda View Post
experts claim guns cause mass shootings
Guns are not a problem. The guy who pulls the trigger on civilians is. You know that semi-automatic guns are freely sold almost everywhere? In South America, Canada, Russia the EU countries etc. But only in the USA these guns are being used for mass shooting. And for some unknown reason Americans prefer to do that in the schools. What's wrong with you, guys?

I can visit any online shop and one of these is mine for less than $500 USD: https://оружие59.рф/catalog/weapons/shotgun/izhmash/

But... I don't need it. I feel secure w/o any gun in my house.
__________________
Obey the Cowgod
just a punk is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 12:26 AM   #94
EonBlue
Apocalypse
 
EonBlue's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 3,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO View Post
Guns are not a problem. The guy who pulls the trigger on civilians is.
^^^ Yep.

Guns are only a problem in the hands of criminals.

Now if only someone could ban criminals.




.
EonBlue is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 02:20 AM   #95
MsCheyenne
Confirmed User
 
MsCheyenne's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett View Post
You complain about people doing nothing but you hate on Democrats who try to push reasonable gun laws. You praise Trump who killed a law Obama signed that was specifically meant to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.. Now you claim and Trump claims mentally ill are the problem..

Humm why then did he sign a EO to allow mentally ill to get guns?


https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/15/polit...lth/index.html


Oh look CNN filling our heads with dumb things Trump did that you will call fake news...

This actually is being taken out of context. First of all, Trump rescinding the bill hasn't taken effect yet. Is the entire system messed up? Yes. Does it rest, solely, on the Democrats or Republicans side? No. It is the entire system. Even if this law, which hadn't of taken effect yet, were in place, this kid slipped through a faulty system. The FBI neglected to respond to multiple warnings. The local county sheriff department refused to respond to 18 warnings about him in a single year. The school district tried to have him baker acted but the doctor at the mental health facility found it unnecessary. The police responded to 39 calls for 911 help at the house regarding this kid but never arrested him. The list is quite long of how this kid slipped through the cracks. In all of this, I hope both parties see they need to work together instead of grandstanding and, pandering to special interest groups. Common sense measures should have been taken after Columbine, 19 years ago. Bill Clinton was in office then.
__________________
MsCheyenne is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 03:17 AM   #96
pimpmaster9000
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pimpmaster9000's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue View Post


quote from the article:

Looking across countries, it would then falsely appear that stricter gun control resulted in higher crime. Economists refer to this as an ?endogeniety? problem. The adoption of the policy is a reaction to other events (that is, ?endogenous?), in this case crime. To resolve this, one must examine how the high-crime areas that chose to adopt the controls changed over time ?not only relative to their own past levels but also relative to areas that did not institute such controls.
__________________
Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
pimpmaster9000 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 03:39 AM   #97
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue View Post
Societal illness.

Why then do you support a sick society being given access to powerful weapons?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 03:40 AM   #98
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Tell that to Timothy Mcveigh...or the 9-11 terrorists
This debate isn't about stopping the terrorist.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 03:46 AM   #99
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy View Post
this is not an argument.

because you can kill someone with a hammer does not mean you have to give them
even more dangerous stuff.

what did change since 9/11 ?
how hard is it today to fly and what a mess are security controls.

and believe me they WOULD forbid to fly if there would be an alternative.

planes are NECESSARY and there is no way to go around that. WHERE is the NEED for a gun?

i mean all numbers you see wherever tell you the same story. why canīt you just accept that USA is the country with the most gun homicides and mass killers.

in all history not even a fraction of americans have been killed from terrorists as from other americans. 9/11 is a big deal for you? ok why are the 100 thousand what got killed since then from other americans are not a big deal ?

in what kind of world you want to live when people seriously discussing to secure kids in schools with the army just because too many people use their right to have a weapon to kill other people ????

you prohibit to smoke a cigarette even outside because it COULD possibly kill someone - so why do you not expect killing from a gun ?

what a fuck is going on in minds what even THINK about such a nonsense ?

there are many many many examples of countries with very restricted laws and they do NOT have the problem - so WHAT other prove do you need for that?
We agree on this.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2018, 03:50 AM   #100
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue View Post
^^^ Yep.

Guns are only a problem in the hands of criminals.

Now if only someone could ban criminals.
Criminals don't shoot up schools, malls, churches, etc. This is about stopping mass shooting where until it starts the perpetrator isn't classed as a criminal.

Are convicted criminals allowed to buy guns?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
experts, mass, shooting, misses, mental, guns, claim, shootings, connecting, illness
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright Đ 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.