Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-08-2018, 06:21 PM   #1
Grapesoda
your favorite band sucks!
 
Grapesoda's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
test on the 35 mm F1.8 at F3.5

straight from the camera.... just resize and a touch of sharp. had the model go into an empty room and do whatever and then a smoking pic out front. I'm impressed with the lens.




__________________
I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned. $.02
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2018, 08:28 PM   #2
Marshal
Biz Dev and SEO
 
Marshal's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 15,126
What exact lens was it? Was it a daylight?
__________________
---
Busy ranking websites on Google...
Marshal is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2018, 09:42 PM   #3
Grapesoda
your favorite band sucks!
 
Grapesoda's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshal View Post
What exact lens was it? Was it a daylight?

TAMRON | SP 35mm F/1.8 Di VC USD
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produ..._f_1_8_di.html

with the nikon d800 body. just me and a girl and natural light. what you see is what came out of the camera other than resizing and a bit of sharp. not even so sure I needed the resizing.
__________________
I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned. $.02
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 06:34 AM   #4
NatalieK
Natalie K
 
NatalieK's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 18,537
this photo here was a 3.5f on a 35mm



If IŽd have used a 1.8f, the photo would have been more blurred on the face & defined or sharper on the ass cheeks & bubbles...

the point is, for a distance shot like you have, really 3.5 up to 5f is ideal & with the portrait the 1.8 or when youŽre focusing on an actual area is relevant
__________________
My official site NatalieK.xxx My free porn & affiliate blog Natalie K affiliate programFirst time girls
Skype: gspotproductions - "Converting your traffic into income since 2005"
NatalieK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 06:54 AM   #5
Grapesoda
your favorite band sucks!
 
Grapesoda's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by GspotProductions View Post
this photo here was a 3.5f on a 35mm



If IŽd have used a 1.8f, the photo would have been more blurred on the face & defined or sharper on the ass cheeks & bubbles...

the point is, for a distance shot like you have, really 3.5 up to 5f is ideal & with the portrait the 1.8 or when youŽre focusing on an actual area is relevant
for me, it depends on the background colours that are going to be blown by the open stop. I really need sharp eyes and facial features. then I start selecting the highlights and colours that will blow out as I set the lens framing and when I test lenses I use people because I'm a people photographer.

some models are more open to a relationship with the camera than others. my experience is amateur models tend to pull the chin and upstage shoulder out of the shot... in this instance, I choose a simple composition so that I could focus on lite because the model would just be too distracting if I had tried anything 'interesting to me'.


I was interested primarily in focus and colour rendition of the lens. I do have a Tamron 24-70 2.8, so I was willing to try out the Tamron 35mm. lenses have different optical coatings on the glass. the bokeh is partially created from the blades inside the lens that close the aperture and the lens coatings and lens shape. lens manufacturers have different formulas hence different renderings.

the point of low DOF is to compose with the bokeh, this offers a greater range of opportunities for dreamy or abstract compositions... the thing is this. some people take snapshots, some people compose carefully calculated imagery. every image I produce is carefully considered and designed. the below is an example I did not shoot. however, you can see the interesting composition aspects of low DOF



18 years on film and tv crews, 25 years as a photographer... 18 years as a professional photographer... I possibly see the world differently than you do? I see angles, shapes, relationships, light and shadow. you might see houses, roads, trees or people... my eyes have been in training for over 35 years, and I shoot almost daily. most of the time I know what an image will look like, including post-production at the moment of creation.

I will use the low DOF creative aspects of the 35mm glass when I have a different model with different opportunities. I might even shoot a few sets tomorrow with this 35mm, all at F8
__________________
I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned. $.02
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 07:28 AM   #6
Cyber Fucker
Hmm
 
Cyber Fucker's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On an endless road around the world for rock and roll.
Posts: 12,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda View Post
straight from the camera.... just resize and a touch of sharp. had the model go into an empty room and do whatever and then a smoking pic out front. I'm impressed with the lens.


Looks very clear/sharp... hmmm.... and hmm... no barrel distortion... or how it's called? Anyway nice pics!
__________________
Cyber Fucker is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 08:00 AM   #7
bns666
Confirmed Fetishist
 
bns666's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fetishland
Posts: 11,473
how is it at f1.8?
__________________
CAM SODASTRIPCHAT
CHATURBATESKYPE SEX CAMS
bns666 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 08:18 AM   #8
Grapesoda
your favorite band sucks!
 
Grapesoda's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker View Post
Looks very clear/sharp... hmmm.... and hmm... no barrel distortion... or how it's called? Anyway nice pics!
tamron 35mm 1.8. I selected the 35 mm because it's the closest 'normal' view with the lest distortion. 28 mm will give barrel distortion, BTW there is a new lens that compensates for barrel distortion

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...ortion-laowa-1
__________________
I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned. $.02
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 08:38 AM   #9
Grapesoda
your favorite band sucks!
 
Grapesoda's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 46,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by bns666 View Post
how is it at f1.8?
haven't tried that. I like a wide stop mainly for light to enter the lens more than to shoot at 1.8.

I'll try and shoot close-ups @ 5.6 and wides at @ F2. shooting wider that F2 is very difficult and you need a great shooting environment.

thinking I'll do a content shoot at F8 with the 35 to see how I like it.. the distortion on the 28-70 freaks me out sometimes... the distortion in 70-200 freaks me out for sure...

I also have a 200 mm 2.0 sitting around somewhere and the 85 mm 1.4.... and I love the 17-35 2.8. I love the rendering of the lens. most beautiful skin. hard to believe in a lens not made to shoot people... right? however, the barrel distortion can get out of control...
__________________
I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned. $.02
Grapesoda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:01 AM   #10
rogueteens
So fucking bland
 
rogueteens's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
Posts: 8,004
cute girl, what is she smoking?
__________________
Free traffic and backlinks from one of the fastest growing adult pinsites on the net - SAUCY PICTURES!
Easily my best performing webcam sponsor - CLICK HERE!!
rogueteens is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
pic, smoking, front, impressed, cents, empty, lens, f3.5, straight, f1.8, camera, model, test, sharp, resize, touch



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.