Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-22-2017, 10:37 AM   #1
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
Ken Starr Helps Lay Out the Plan for Donald Trump to be Indicted

Thanks Ken Starr! Trump can be indicted due to your relentless work trying to impeach Bill Clinton and the memos laying out your plan for his Indictement


-----

NY Times Full Article

REVEALED: Secret Clinton-era Ken Starr memo provides blueprint for indicting President Trump


A Pulitzer Prize New York Times journalist used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain a 56-page legal memo which concludes a sitting President can be indicted.

The Times reports that the legal memo, ?amounts to the most thorough government-commissioned analysis rejecting a generally held view that presidents are immune from prosecution while in office.?

?It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president?s official duties,? the memo concludes. ?In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.?

While this memo is said to be the most thorough government analysis of the constitutional question, Ken Starr was not the first special counsel to reach such a conclusion.

?In 1974, the Watergate special counsel, Leon Jaworski, had also received a memo from his staff saying he could indict the president, in that instance Richard M. Nixon, while he was in office, and later made that case in a court brief,? The Times reported.

One hypothetic listed in the 1998 memo is what would happen if a sitting President punched a heckler.

?No one would suggest that the president should be removed from office simply because of that assault,? the memo suggests. ?Yet the president has no right to assault hecklers. If there is no recourse against the president, if he cannot be prosecuted for violating the criminal laws, he will be above the law.?

?Other prosecutors working for Mr. Starr developed a draft indictment of Mr. Clinton, which The Times has also requested be made public. The National Archives has not processed that file to determine whether it is exempt from disclosure under grand-jury secrecy rules,? The Times noted.
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2017, 12:31 PM   #2
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
?It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president?s official duties,? the Starr office memo concludes. ?In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.?

Did someone think otherwise?
There has to be enough evidence to return an indictment.

A President could be impeached alter a conviction of a crime in office as mentioned.
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2017, 12:49 PM   #3
RedFred
Confirmed User
 
RedFred's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,782
RedFred is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2017, 01:26 PM   #4
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam View Post
?It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president?s official duties,? the Starr office memo concludes. ?In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.?

Did someone think otherwise?
There has to be enough evidence to return an indictment.

A President could be impeached alter a conviction of a crime in office as mentioned.
You are aware that detectives don't tell the public as they gather evidence right?

These Trumpers who say there's no evidence are idiots. The reason Mueller has expanded his team to over 30 specialized investigators AND prosecuters is because he has a lot of evidence. A special counsel doesn't hire specialized money laundering prosecuters, unless his investigators have evidence.

"Carr confirmed to The Washington Post that Brandon Van Grack, a Justice Department national security division prosecutor; Rush Atkinson, a trial attorney in the fraud section; and Andrew D. Goldstein, who had headed the public corruption unit in the U.S. Attorney?s Office in the Southern District of New York; and Zainab Ahmad, an assistant U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of New York specializing in terrorism cases, also had been assigned to work with the group.

Goldstein had worked in the office under U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who was fired by Trump after he refused to resign upon request and who has said publicly that he had unusual exchanges with the president.

Ahmad was recently profiled by the New Yorker for having prosecuted 13 terrorism cases without a single loss."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...nder-scrutiny/
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2017, 01:53 PM   #5
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 70,212
I see no reason why a sitting US President cannot be taken to court or sued. Seems to me Trump is already involved in a number of lawsuits. They don't just go away because he became President.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
president, memo, times, starr, ken, legal, sitting, clinton, analysis, concludes, constitutional, indict, criminal, law.?, counsel, special, office, ?in, plan, indicted, indictement, trump, heckler, ?yet, punched



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.