New American Warship U.S.S. Billings Launched Today Headed to South Korea ( video ) - GoFuckYourself.com

Bladewire · 07-02-2017, 03:45 PM

USS Billings is a Freedom-class littoral combat ship of the United States Navy. It will be the first ship in naval service named after Billings, Montana.

mineistaken · 07-02-2017, 03:50 PM

Thanks, Donald.

Bladewire · 07-02-2017, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Thanks, Donald.

Oh it started being made in 2013. You're an idiot thanking Obama, your negro nemisis in your motherland Slovakia

mineistaken · 07-02-2017, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Oh it started being made in 2013. You're an idiot thanking Obama, your negro nemisis in your motherland Slovakia

Lol, clown shoes takes phrase "Thanks, Donald" literally

BaldBastard · 07-02-2017, 04:15 PM

Can it detect a merchant boat heading towards it at 4 knots, without it splitting the boat in two?

Seems to be the current major problem

pimpmaster9000 · 07-02-2017, 04:25 PM

USIS deploys its new weapon for terrorism...in other news Al akbr el azzizzi came out with a new line of IED- s that go boom more than the previous models...stay tuned for more global military protection racket news!

DraX · 07-02-2017, 04:32 PM

Looking good, Kim Jung Un will shit his pants when he see's it...

More of a personal wish than reality though...

Rochard · 07-02-2017, 04:38 PM

These ships are ideal for special forces....

Bladewire · 07-02-2017, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

These ships are ideal for special forces....

Indeed

Look Chang · 07-02-2017, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard

Can it detect a merchant boat heading towards it at 4 knots, without it splitting the boat in two?

Seems to be the current major problem

Unfortunately, it's an actual concern.

Bladewire · 07-02-2017, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Look Chang

Unfortunately, it's an actual concern.

It's not actually

Barry-xlovecam · 07-02-2017, 07:11 PM

Why would we want to invade North Korea? That would be incredibly stupid.

Starve them -- lay siege. Capitulate or die.
If they make a suicide attack -- give them what they asked for -- death.

The last thing we need is a long drawn out war in Asia.

pimpmaster9000 · 07-03-2017, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Why would we want to invade North Korea? That would be incredibly stupid.

Starve them -- lay siege. Capitulate or die.
If they make a suicide attack -- give them what they asked for -- death.

The last thing we need is a long drawn out war in Asia.

Oh yes starve them LOL they are there for the USA to starve if the USA feels like it...this is why all countries should have nukes or bacteria...

Barry-xlovecam · 07-03-2017, 04:57 AM

NK is not interested in coexisting peace fully in this world.
NK is not interested in negotiating in good faith with the other half of their countrymen in Seoul toward some reunification.
If NK used weapons of mass destruction -- the counter strike would end their existence.
NK has proliferated nuclear weapons technology to aggressive and unstable regimes.

North Korea's government must die. The common people of NK could be spared if possible but most of them will die if they follow Kim Jong Un to their graves.

pimpmaster9000 · 07-03-2017, 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

[*]NK is not interested in coexisting peace fully in this world.

neither is the US government...(insert US invasions since ww2 map here)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

[*]NK is not interested in negotiating in good faith with the other half of their countrymen in Seoul toward some reunification.

this is their right...they are under no obligation to do anything the "lesser of 2 evils" US gov and potus want it to do...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

[*]If NK used weapons of mass destruction -- the counter strike would end their existence.

leave them alone and they wont use WMD...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

[*]NK has proliferated nuclear weapons technology to aggressive and unstable regimes.[/LIST]

everybody should own nukes...fuck being the next vietnam/korea/iraq/avghanistan etc...you get a right to complain about it when you lead by setting a good example...the USA is the #1 reason most countries are scrambling to develop nukes...3rd world countries are not obliged to be your war games grounds...invaders should not get to feel safe...no reason for this at all...

Paul Markham · 07-03-2017, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

NK is not interested in coexisting peace fully in this world.
NK is not interested in negotiating in good faith with the other half of their countrymen in Seoul toward some reunification.
If NK used weapons of mass destruction -- the counter strike would end their existence.
NK has proliferated nuclear weapons technology to aggressive and unstable regimes.

North Korea's government must die. The common people of NK could be spared if possible but most of them will die if they follow Kim Jong Un to their graves.

Unfortunately China is protecting NK. And while China produces all those American goods it's safe.

Bladewire · 07-03-2017, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Unfortunately China is protecting NK. And while China produces all those American goods it's safe.

NK is China's mask where they can threaten the world through NK with it hurting China's image, but the gig is up. The world is realizing NK is like America's Mexico, but with nukes

Bladewire · 07-03-2017, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Why would we want to invade North Korea? That would be incredibly stupid.

Starve them -- lay siege. Capitulate or die.
If they make a suicide attack -- give them what they asked for -- death.

The last thing we need is a long drawn out war in Asia.

Not war, just take away their toys.

It has to happen, they are a threat to us, constantly threatening us. Not to mentioning delivering that boy braindead.

Barry-xlovecam · 07-03-2017, 08:34 AM

If the North Korea does what they want within their own borders and does not threaten anyone -- I could care less.

Since the Korean War; no one has invaded NK and no one has bombed NK. North Korea's aggressive military posture and threats are not the reason. Remember Saddam? That was a lose-lose really.

Yes China is the NK 'enabler' but the Chinese are playing a very risky game.

Bladewire · 07-03-2017, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

If the North Korea does what they want within their own borders and does not threaten anyone -- I could care less.

Since the Korean War; no one has invaded NK and no one has bombed NK. North Korea's aggressive military posture and threats are not the reason. Remember Saddam? That was a lose-lose really.

Yes China is the NK 'enabler' but the Chinese are playing a very risky game.

We have enough cheap Chinese crap fuck them and teach them about being chicken shit and using NK as their puppet to intimidate us. NK is the only country with nukes sending off missiles constantly saying they're going to nuke us, their nuke capability has to be eliminated or we are going to regret it big time later, like we regret letting China militarize those man-made islands. China is going to fuck us in South China Sea anyway, no need to be nice to those fucks pretending we don't know what's up.

baddog · 07-03-2017, 10:06 AM

Bladeliar couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it.

The future USS Billings is 83 percent done. It will take about a year and a half of construction before joining the Navy fleet.

Barry-xlovecam · 07-03-2017, 10:10 AM

Great. America cuts off Chinese trade then China calls in their US Treasury bonds. Trump says NO WAY! The US reneges on repayment (by some EO?) then the US dollar crashes and we all go into a economic depression over a bad mouthed fat-ass boy?

That outcome is not that unlikely under your scheme.
Maybe, I am wrong -- do you think that is an outlandish outcome?

Trump playing gunboat diplomacy is school-kid, hot head diplomacy -- he's not going to scare the Chinese and just end up with a plane forced down like Bush did in 2001. Then Trump will have to back down, humiliated. Or, Trump the Useless will start a shooting war we cannot win because his ego is bruised.

Never fight a war you cannot win. Warfare has been reduced to petty squabbles fought in weak countries for a good reason.

Bladewire · 07-03-2017, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Great. America cuts off Chinese trade then China calls in their US Treasury bonds. Trump says NO WAY! The US reneges on repayment (by some EO?) then the US dollar crashes and we all go into a economic depression over a bad mouthed fat-ass boy?

That outcome is not that unlikely under your scheme.
Maybe, I am wrong -- do you think that is an outlandish outcome?

Trump playing gunboat diplomacy is school-kid, hot head diplomacy -- he's not going to scare the Chinese and just end up with a plane forced down like Bush did in 2001. Then Trump will have to back down, humiliated. Or, Trump the Useless will start a shooting war we cannot win because his ego is bruised.

Never fight a war you cannot win. Warfare has been reduced to petty squabbles fought in weak countries for a good reason.

Oh ok.

We'll go decades more with China bleeding us dry, taking our jobs & dominance, NK threatening us on China's behalf and China restricting access to the South China Sea.

The Chinese are cowardly thieves and we're empowering them by taking no action, military or otherwise. Reagan fucked us with the Chinese (selling us out) and Russians (prolonging the cold war with needless wasted military buildup). We should have let the Chinese starve now they're like z bunch of rats trying to take over the planet with uncontrolled breeding.

baddog · 07-03-2017, 10:32 AM

pimpmaster9000 · 07-03-2017, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Oh ok.

We'll go decades more with China bleeding us dry, taking our jobs & dominance, NK threatening us on China's behalf and China restricting access to the South China Sea.

The Chinese are cowardly thieves and we're empowering them by taking no action, military or otherwise. Reagan fucked us with the Chinese (selling us out) and Russians (prolonging the cold war with needless wasted military buildup). We should have let the Chinese starve now they're like z bunch of rats trying to take over the planet with uncontrolled breeding.

paul markham alert

the chineese are literally forcing you to buy their cheap shit and to outsource...ask paul...

Bladewire · 07-03-2017, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

paul markham alert

the chineese are literally forcing you to buy their cheap shit and to outsource...ask paul...

Really! How so?

07-02-2017, 04:25 PM	#6
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	USIS deploys its new weapon for terrorism...in other news Al akbr el azzizzi came out with a new line of IED- s that go boom more than the previous models...stay tuned for more global military protection racket news! __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

07-02-2017, 04:32 PM	#7
DraX Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: In wonderland.. Posts: 7,121	Looking good, Kim Jung Un will shit his pants when he see's it... More of a personal wish than reality though... __________________ Deposit Today With BTC - Play With Bitcoins

07-02-2017, 04:38 PM	#8
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 70,229	These ships are ideal for special forces.... __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

07-03-2017, 04:57 AM	#14
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	NK is not interested in coexisting peace fully in this world. NK is not interested in negotiating in good faith with the other half of their countrymen in Seoul toward some reunification. If NK used weapons of mass destruction -- the counter strike would end their existence. NK has proliferated nuclear weapons technology to aggressive and unstable regimes. North Korea's government must die. The common people of NK could be spared if possible but most of them will die if they follow Kim Jong Un to their graves.

07-02-2017, 03:45 PM	#1
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,232	New American Warship U.S.S. Billings Launched Today Headed to South Korea ( video ) USS Billings is a Freedom-class littoral combat ship of the United States Navy. It will be the first ship in naval service named after Billings, Montana.

07-02-2017, 03:50 PM	#2
mineistaken See signature :) Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: ICQ 363 097 773 Posts: 29,656	Thanks, Donald.

07-02-2017, 04:15 PM	#5
BaldBastard Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Sydney Posts: 14,499	Can it detect a merchant boat heading towards it at 4 knots, without it splitting the boat in two? Seems to be the current major problem

07-02-2017, 07:11 PM	#12
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Why would we want to invade North Korea? That would be incredibly stupid. Starve them -- lay siege. Capitulate or die. If they make a suicide attack -- give them what they asked for -- death. The last thing we need is a long drawn out war in Asia.

07-03-2017, 08:34 AM	#19
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	If the North Korea does what they want within their own borders and does not threaten anyone -- I could care less. Since the Korean War; no one has invaded NK and no one has bombed NK. North Korea's aggressive military posture and threats are not the reason. Remember Saddam? That was a lose-lose really. Yes China is the NK 'enabler' but the Chinese are playing a very risky game.

07-03-2017, 10:06 AM	#21
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,090	Bladeliar couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. The future USS Billings is 83 percent done. It will take about a year and a half of construction before joining the Navy fleet.

07-03-2017, 10:10 AM	#22
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	Great. America cuts off Chinese trade then China calls in their US Treasury bonds. Trump says NO WAY! The US reneges on repayment (by some EO?) then the US dollar crashes and we all go into a economic depression over a bad mouthed fat-ass boy? That outcome is not that unlikely under your scheme. Maybe, I am wrong -- do you think that is an outlandish outcome? Trump playing gunboat diplomacy is school-kid, hot head diplomacy -- he's not going to scare the Chinese and just end up with a plane forced down like Bush did in 2001. Then Trump will have to back down, humiliated. Or, Trump the Useless will start a shooting war we cannot win because his ego is bruised. Never fight a war you cannot win. Warfare has been reduced to petty squabbles fought in weak countries for a good reason.

07-03-2017, 10:32 AM	#24
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,090