I got a DMCA notice

[adultchatpay]

So i got a "Notice of DMCA removal from Google Search"
blah blah blah...
Here are the affected URL(s):

mywebsite.com/tag/webcam
..and a bunch of other website included in the ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS:
Including pornhub,. etc

Is this even a valid DMCA removal notice? It's so broad, i mean there are literally thousand of videos in that category.

What do usually do next with that?

[Klen]

I got same, but i dont give a shit about it, it's not link i rank for keyword webcam lol.

[j3rkules]

Change the name of the tag so it will appear on the search results.

[Klen]

Originally Posted by j3rkules

Change the name of the tag so it will appear on the search results.

This have nothing with tag lol

[freecartoonporn]

file counter DMCA with google and https://lumendatabase.org/

[incredibleworkethic]

I remove the content, keep the blog post up and counter DMCA saying I wrote the content and took any infringing content down.

[adultchatpay]

How can i take the content down when the complained url is the entire "webcam" category. I am using the content respecting the fair use policy.

And there are thousands of videos, pictures and descriptions there.
The orignating URL of the complain is https://chaturbate.com/karen_lv/
And her channel is even blocked there.

Anyway, submitted a counter DMCA. And let's see.

[gnawledge]

A lot of DMCA nonsense is sent out by models or first time cam sluts or dudes thinking money is gonna roll in. Then they realize their room is saved or archived somewhere and get butt hurt about it. If you do an RSS feed and it's saved, delete the post. If not-- fuck it.

[Klen]

Originally Posted by gnawledge

A lot of DMCA nonsense is sent out by models or first time cam sluts or dudes thinking money is gonna roll in. Then they realize their room is saved or archived somewhere and get butt hurt about it. If you do an RSS feed and it's saved, delete the post. If not-- fuck it.

I once had complaint from playboy model for having "her first and last name" in pornstar index. She was mentioning some "new york privacy law". I removed it so she can stop bothering me, but she was even demanding to remove it from yahoo/google index which is impossible as it takes time for search engines to update.

[Klen]

Originally Posted by adultchatpay

How can i take the content down when the complained url is the entire "webcam" category. I am using the content respecting the fair use policy.

And there are thousands of videos, pictures and descriptions there.
The originating URL of the complain is https://chaturbate.com/karen_lv/
And her channel is even blocked there.

Anyway, submitted a counter DMCA. And let's see.

As i said, unless you receiving search engine traffic directly to your webcam section, dont bother. But yes it's a stupid thing.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by incredibleworkethic

I remove the content, keep the blog post up and counter DMCA saying I wrote the content and took any infringing content down.

Good business

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by adultchatpay

How can i take the content down when the complained url is the entire "webcam" category. I am using the content respecting the fair use policy.

And there are thousands of videos, pictures and descriptions there.
The orignating URL of the complain is https://chaturbate.com/karen_lv/
And her channel is even blocked there.

Anyway, submitted a counter DMCA. And let's see.

Just take it down common sense, no offense

[TheDynasty]

I just take it down and continue on with new blogs can't let one model get ya down

[The Porn Nerd]

And...............so?

[Bladewire]

You're in the wrong business if you get attached to content.

On the rare instance you get a DMCA take the content down and move on.

The only people attached to content are those with rights to it and you don't want your business and personal life targeted so you act in good will and comply with the law it's common sense

[Klen]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

You're in the wrong business if you get attached to content.

On the rare instance you get a DMCA take the content down and move on.

The only people attached to content are those with rights to it and you don't want your business and personal life targeted so you act in good will and comply with the law it's common sense

What he is running probably same shit as i do - tube embed scrapper , and it's absurd to send DMCA to tube scrapper, as if content is already removed on original tube, then it does not exist anymore on any tube which embed it.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris

What he is running probably same shit as i do - tube embed scrapper , and it's absurd to send DMCA to tube scrapper, as if content is already removed on original tube, then it does not exist anymore on any tube which embed it.

In this case you know the content creator wants the content down and eventually you're going to have a placeholder image that, when clicked, is going to go to an error message that it's no longer available.

So either you remove/change your "link" and the content lives on with the host until the owner eventually​ figures out who the host is.

Or you keep the "link" on your site and have to deal with whatever bullshit the content owner or DMCA company throws your way.

I personally like to fly under the radar and stay focused on making money. Fighting DMCA's and drawing attention to myself with content creators is not my focus or desire.

If they don't see it after the DMCA they are happy. Very simple right?

[Klen]

Originally Posted by Bladewire

In this case you know the content creator wants the content down and eventually you're going to have a placeholder image that, when clicked, is going to go to an error message that it's no longer available.

So either you remove/change your "link" and the content lives on with the host until the owner eventually​ figures out who the host is.

Or you keep the "link" on your site and have to deal with whatever bullshit the content owner or DMCA company throws your way.

I personally like to fly under the radar and stay focused on making money. Fighting DMCA's and drawing attention to myself with content creators is not my focus or desire.

If they don't see it after the DMCA they are happy. Very simple right?

In my case it's only placeholder text, so sending a DMCA for a mere text , without any actual content is absurd and it's case of automated DMCA scanner where they dont bother to check does offending site actually have offending content or not.